SAP Exam C_HAMOD_2404 Topic 6 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HAMOD_2404 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 6

[All C_HAMOD_2404 Questions]

Why would you choose to implement a referential join?

ATo develop a series of linked joins

BTo define conditions for potential data source pruning

CTo reuse the settings of an existing join

DTo automate the setting of cardinality rules

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Angelo at Sep 17, 2024, 03:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HAMOD_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leeann

1 months ago

Referential join? More like 'refer-to-the-manual' join, amirite? But seriously, B seems like the way to go. Gotta keep that data flow lean and mean!

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

1 months ago

A, B, C, D - I'm like a referential join ninja, trying to master them all! Though if I had to pick, I'd say B. Pruning data sources, that's where the real magic happens.

upvoted 0 times

Major

2 days ago

D) To ignore unnecessary data sources

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

8 days ago

C) To develop a series of linked joins

upvoted 0 times

...

Pauline

9 days ago

B) To reuse the settings of an existing join

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

13 days ago

A) To automate the setting of cardinality rules

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

1 months ago

C) To develop a series of linked joins

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

1 months ago

B) To reuse the settings of an existing join

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

1 months ago

A) To automate the setting of cardinality rules

upvoted 0 times

...

Ona

2 months ago

I think option B) To define conditions for potential data source pruning could also be a valid reason. It helps in optimizing the query performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

2 months ago

I agree with Dortha. Reusing settings can save time and ensure consistency in the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

2 months ago

Woah, hold up, I'm feeling a bit D-lirious here. Automating cardinality rules? That's where it's at, folks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickie

2 months ago

C is the way to go. Reusing existing join settings? Sign me up! Who doesn't love a little automation, amirite?

upvoted 0 times

Emmanuel

1 months ago

C) To develop a series of linked joins

upvoted 0 times

...

Amira

1 months ago

B) To reuse the settings of an existing join

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

C) To develop a series of linked joins

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

2 months ago

I would choose option C) To reuse the settings of an existing join.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

2 months ago

I'd go with B - defining conditions for potential data source pruning. That's the key reason we'd implement a referential join, right? Gotta optimize that data flow!

upvoted 0 times

Gaynell

1 months ago

Agreed, defining conditions for potential data source pruning is crucial for efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

2 months ago

Yes, that's correct. B is the right choice for optimizing data flow.

upvoted 0 times

...