BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_CPI_2404 Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mozell
1 months ago
Event-driven design? Psh, what is this, amateur hour? Real architects use quantum entanglement to transmit notifications. Get with the times, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 months ago
Request-driven design? What is this, the 90s? We're talking about asynchronous architecture here, folks. Event-driven is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
9 days ago
Request-driven design may be outdated for this type of architecture. Event-driven design offers more flexibility and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
16 days ago
I agree, event-driven design allows for better communication between partners without being tied to a specific request-response model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
19 days ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denna
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Serverless design could also work for exchanging notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
1 months ago
Serverless, huh? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure it's the best fit for notification exchange. Seems a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
18 days ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
24 days ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
1 months ago
B) Hexagonal design
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
1 months ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
1 months ago
I agree with Frederica, event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) Event-driven design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
Hexagonal design? Really? That's more for managing different interfaces, not notifications. Come on, people, let's get serious here.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
24 days ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 months ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 months ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tenesha
2 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
1 months ago
True, serverless design can be a cost-effective and efficient way to handle notifications in an asynchronous system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
1 months ago
I think serverless design could also be a good option for exchanging notifications in an asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 months ago
I agree, event-driven design allows for better scalability and flexibility in handling notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
1 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
2 months ago
I agree, it allows for decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
2 months ago
Event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel