SAP Exam C_CPI_15 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_15 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 1

[All C_CPI_15 Questions]

What can you use to prevent overload in an OData request and reply call?

AQuery filter

BHTTP adapter

CStop parameter

DPaging

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Willow at Apr 10, 2024, 08:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_CPI_15 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Pura

10 months ago

Serverless, huh? Might as well build my architecture in the clouds and let the wind carry the messages.

upvoted 0 times

Tiffiny

9 months ago

C) Serverless design can definitely help with scalability and cost efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmett

9 months ago

A) Event-driven design sounds like the way to go for asynchronous notifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

9 months ago

Event-driven design could also work well for exchanging notifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

10 months ago

Hexagonal design might be a good option for building an architecture that is largely asynchronous.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margret

10 months ago

Serverless design is a great option for asynchronous notifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

10 months ago

I think serverless design could work well for exchanging notifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

10 months ago

Event-driven design sounds like the way to go for asynchronous notifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

11 months ago

I would go with A) Event-driven design because it allows for loosely coupled components and scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

11 months ago

I think both A) and C) could work, depending on the specific requirements of the architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

11 months ago

Ooh, hexagonal design sounds fancy. I bet it has some cool geometric shapes involved.

upvoted 0 times

Doyle

10 months ago

I see, event-driven design is a good choice for asynchronous architectures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

10 months ago

A) Event-driven design

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

10 months ago

Hexagonal design does not actually involve geometric shapes, it's just a design pattern.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shay

10 months ago

Hexagonal design does sound interesting, but I agree that event-driven design is probably the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carry

10 months ago

D) Request-driven design

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

10 months ago

C) Serverless design

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

10 months ago

I think I would go with event-driven design for asynchronous architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

11 months ago

B) Hexagonal design

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

11 months ago

A) Event-driven design

upvoted 0 times

...

Nettie

11 months ago

I disagree. I believe the best option is C) Serverless design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

11 months ago

Event-driven design all the way! Notifications flying around like fireflies on a summer night.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

11 months ago

I think the answer is A) Event-driven design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phil

1 years ago

Agreed. Hexagonal design and request-driven design don't really fit the bill here. They're more about the application structure, not the communication model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

1 years ago

Hmm, good point. Serverless could work, but I think event-driven design is a more direct and established pattern for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latricia

1 years ago

What about serverless design? Wouldn't that also work well for an asynchronous architecture? It can handle the scalability and event-driven aspects.

upvoted 0 times

Gilma

11 months ago

I agree, event-driven design allows for loosely coupled components which is great for asynchronous communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

11 months ago

I think event-driven design may be a better fit for exchanging notifications in an asynchronous system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

11 months ago

Yes, you're right. Serverless design can definitely work well for asynchronous architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuonne

1 years ago

I agree, event-driven design is the way to go. It gives us the flexibility to add new partners or modify existing ones without disrupting the entire system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

1 years ago

Definitely, I'm leaning towards option A. Event-driven design is perfect for asynchronous notifications between partners. It allows for loose coupling and scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 years ago

I think this is a great question to test our understanding of asynchronous architectures. The key here is to identify the design pattern that best facilitates decoupled, event-driven communication.

upvoted 0 times

...