B and D, no doubt. I mean, if the question says there are two correct answers, it's probably not going to be the ones that sound like they were made up on the spot.
Wait, there's a dataflow scheduler in the Console? I thought that was just a place to store our cat GIFs. This exam is getting way too technical for my taste.
Hmm, I'm going with A and D. Who needs the console when you can just use the API? Plus, the idx.setDataflow endpoint sounds like it could be fun to play with.
I agree with you, A and D seem like the best options. The API can be more efficient and the idx.setDataflow endpoint could provide some useful functionality.
I prefer B and C actually. The console can be helpful for troubleshooting and the idx.setDataflow endpoint may not be necessary for this configuration.
I think B and C are the way to go. The console's scheduler is the easiest, but using an extension to schedule the dataflow could give you more control.
B and D seem like the best options to me. Using the console's dataflow scheduler and the createScheduling endpoint would be the most straightforward way to configure this.
Jettie
6 months agoAlberta
6 months agoBulah
6 months agoStarr
5 months agoJolanda
5 months agoDaniel
5 months agoKristian
6 months agoArletta
5 months agoVirgie
5 months agoJoanna
5 months agoTrinidad
5 months agoHoward
6 months agoLindsey
5 months agoKami
6 months agoSarah
6 months agoCecil
6 months agoTrina
6 months agoCaprice
7 months agoIlona
7 months agoTrina
7 months ago