B and D, no doubt. I mean, if the question says there are two correct answers, it's probably not going to be the ones that sound like they were made up on the spot.
Wait, there's a dataflow scheduler in the Console? I thought that was just a place to store our cat GIFs. This exam is getting way too technical for my taste.
Hmm, I'm going with A and D. Who needs the console when you can just use the API? Plus, the idx.setDataflow endpoint sounds like it could be fun to play with.
I agree with you, A and D seem like the best options. The API can be more efficient and the idx.setDataflow endpoint could provide some useful functionality.
I prefer B and C actually. The console can be helpful for troubleshooting and the idx.setDataflow endpoint may not be necessary for this configuration.
I think B and C are the way to go. The console's scheduler is the easiest, but using an extension to schedule the dataflow could give you more control.
B and D seem like the best options to me. Using the console's dataflow scheduler and the createScheduling endpoint would be the most straightforward way to configure this.
Jettie
1 months agoAlberta
1 months agoBulah
1 months agoStarr
9 days agoJolanda
11 days agoDaniel
14 days agoKristian
1 months agoArletta
22 hours agoVirgie
2 days agoJoanna
4 days agoTrinidad
22 days agoHoward
2 months agoLindsey
24 days agoKami
1 months agoSarah
1 months agoCecil
1 months agoTrina
2 months agoCaprice
2 months agoIlona
2 months agoTrina
2 months ago