B and D, no doubt. I mean, if the question says there are two correct answers, it's probably not going to be the ones that sound like they were made up on the spot.
Wait, there's a dataflow scheduler in the Console? I thought that was just a place to store our cat GIFs. This exam is getting way too technical for my taste.
Hmm, I'm going with A and D. Who needs the console when you can just use the API? Plus, the idx.setDataflow endpoint sounds like it could be fun to play with.
I agree with you, A and D seem like the best options. The API can be more efficient and the idx.setDataflow endpoint could provide some useful functionality.
I prefer B and C actually. The console can be helpful for troubleshooting and the idx.setDataflow endpoint may not be necessary for this configuration.
I think B and C are the way to go. The console's scheduler is the easiest, but using an extension to schedule the dataflow could give you more control.
B and D seem like the best options to me. Using the console's dataflow scheduler and the createScheduling endpoint would be the most straightforward way to configure this.
Jettie
4 months agoAlberta
4 months agoBulah
4 months agoStarr
3 months agoJolanda
3 months agoDaniel
4 months agoKristian
4 months agoArletta
3 months agoVirgie
3 months agoJoanna
3 months agoTrinidad
4 months agoHoward
5 months agoLindsey
4 months agoKami
4 months agoSarah
5 months agoCecil
5 months agoTrina
5 months agoCaprice
5 months agoIlona
5 months agoTrina
5 months ago