Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_C4H46_2408 Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H46_2408 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All C_C4H46_2408 Questions]

You need to create an embedded component that is self-container. Data binding and controller logic need to be defined within that embedded component.

What type of binding between the parent component and the embedded component would you choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Charlene at Nov 16, 2024, 05:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_C4H46_2408 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cristal
2 months ago
I can't believe D) is even an option. That's like trying to drive a car with your feet. Just no.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
D) Tight coupling by node reference binding? What is this, the stone age? Come on, people, let's move into the 21st century!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B) and C). Loose coupling is the way to go, but I'm not sure which method is better. Anyone have any thoughts?
upvoted 0 times
Barb
1 months ago
I agree, C) sounds like the most flexible option for data binding between components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
I think C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audria
2 months ago
A) Tight coupling by explicit binding? Nah, that's way too inflexible. I'd avoid that like the plague.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
25 days ago
B) Yeah, tight coupling by explicit binding can make it harder to make changes in the future. Loose coupling is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
26 days ago
A) Tight coupling by node reference binding could work, but I think it's better to go with a more flexible option like loose coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
28 days ago
C) I agree, loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping would make the components more reusable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
2 months ago
B) Loose coupling by node reference binding sounds like a better option. It allows for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Venita
2 months ago
I prefer option A) Tight coupling by explicit binding. It may require more effort, but it provides better control over the data flow between components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
2 months ago
C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping is definitely the way to go. This allows for a clean separation of concerns and makes the component truly self-contained.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
1 months ago
C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
B) Loose coupling by node reference binding
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 months ago
A) Tight coupling by explicit binding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
3 months ago
I agree with Cora. Using inport and outport context mapping allows for better encapsulation and reusability of the embedded component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
3 months ago
I think I would choose option C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel