BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BYD15_1908 Topic 7 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BYD15_1908 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 7
[All C_BYD15_1908 Questions]

A company needs to provide statutory reporting in local GAAP within its country of registration.

In addition, IFRS statutory reports are necessary due to group reporting.

Which one of the following approaches can achieve multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Novella at Jan 24, 2024, 09:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BYD15_1908 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Devora
5 months ago
Option D, all the way! Ledgers are where it's at. Forget about adjusting postings, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
5 months ago
A classic case of 'two sets of books' - option C is the way to go! Don't try to juggle your accounts, just keep them separate.
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
4 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacki
5 months ago
Option A sounds a bit too simple. I doubt a single company could handle both local GAAP and IFRS reporting requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Mike
4 months ago
I agree, having distinct set of books for each accounting principle would ensure accurate reporting for both local GAAP and IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
5 months ago
I think option C could be a better approach, having separate set of books for each accounting principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
5 months ago
Option A might be simpler, but it may not be sufficient for handling both local GAAP and IFRS reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if option B is a good idea. Trying to adjust postings to achieve IFRS seems like it could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
6 months ago
I'd go with option C. Having two separate sets of books gives you more flexibility in managing the reporting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Arletta
5 months ago
Option C it is then, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
5 months ago
I agree, having separate sets of books for each accounting principle is the most efficient way to handle multi-GAAP reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
5 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
I agree, having separate sets of books makes it easier to meet both reporting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
5 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
5 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. It makes it easier to keep track of everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
5 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marge
6 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Defining separate ledgers for local GAAP and IFRS is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Aretha
5 months ago
So, it seems like defining separate ledgers is the best way to ensure compliance and accuracy in reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Definitely, especially when dealing with multi-GAAP requirements for group reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
5 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to maintain accuracy and compliance in statutory reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
5 months ago
It might be more efficient, but having separate ledgers can prevent any confusion or errors in reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
5 months ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to just have one set of books with both accounting principles?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
5 months ago
I agree, having separate ledgers will ensure accurate reporting for both local GAAP and IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
6 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Defining separate ledgers for local GAAP and IFRS is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel