BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BYD15_1908 Topic 3 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BYD15_1908 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 3
[All C_BYD15_1908 Questions]

A company needs to provide statutory reporting in local GAAP within its country of registration.

In addition, IFRS statutory reports are necessary due to group reporting.

Which one of the following approaches can achieve multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nikita at May 08, 2024, 11:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BYD15_1908 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
France
5 months ago
But option B is less invasive. Just close and adjust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
6 months ago
I think C could work too. One set of books for each principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
Because defining one ledger for local GAAP and one for IFRS sounds straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who came up with option A was just messing with us. 'Define one company with local GAAP, one with IFRS'? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
5 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a safer choice for multi-GAAP reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
6 months ago
Option A does seem a bit risky, it could get confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
6 months ago
C looks promising. Two sets of books? That's double the fun and double the headaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
6 months ago
Hmm, why D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Adjusting the local GAAP period to get IFRS? That's some real accounting magic right there.
upvoted 0 times
France
5 months ago
It's definitely a tough decision to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
5 months ago
I still think option B is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
5 months ago
True, having separate sets of books could simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
Option C might be a good middle ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
I agree, adjusting the local GAAP period sounds like a challenge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
6 months ago
But option B seems like it could save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
6 months ago
I think option A is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilson
6 months ago
Option D definitely seems the way to go. Separate ledgers for local GAAP and IFRS? Sounds like a piece of cake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
It's a bit specific. I think option D seems most practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
6 months ago
What do you think about the question on multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel