BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BYD15_1908 Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BYD15_1908 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All C_BYD15_1908 Questions]

A company needs to provide statutory reporting in local GAAP within its country of registration.

In addition, IFRS statutory reports are necessary due to group reporting.

Which one of the following approaches can achieve multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cassi at Aug 03, 2024, 07:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BYD15_1908 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ivan
2 months ago
I prefer option B because it allows for more flexibility in reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
3 months ago
A company with two accounting principles? Sounds like they're trying to run a circus, not a business. Option C is the clown-free choice.
upvoted 0 times
Jerrod
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maira
3 months ago
I think option C is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
3 months ago
I see your point, Laquita, but having separate ledgers could make it easier to track the differences between local GAAP and IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
3 months ago
But wouldn't option D be more efficient in terms of reporting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
3 months ago
I agree with Karrie, having separate sets of books makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
3 months ago
Option B? Seriously? Doing adjustments after the fact? That sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'd steer clear of that one.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option B does sound risky. I think option C or D would be a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
D) Define one ledger for the local accounting principle and one ledger with an accounting principle IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
2 months ago
C) Define one set of books with a local accounting principle and one set of books with an accounting principle IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
A) Define one company with a local accounting principle and one with an accounting principle IFRS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ammie
3 months ago
I like the idea of Option D. Having different ledgers for each accounting principle sounds like a clean and organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
Polly
2 months ago
I agree, having separate ledgers for each accounting principle would make reporting much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
3 months ago
Option D sounds like a good choice. It would definitely help keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Separating the books into local GAAP and IFRS makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Janella
2 months ago
Option C does seem like the most straightforward approach to ensure accurate multi-GAAP reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
2 months ago
I think option D could also work, having different ledgers for each accounting principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
2 months ago
I agree, having separate sets of books for each accounting principle would make reporting much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karrie
3 months ago
I think option C is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel