SAP Exam C_BW4H_214 Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BW4H_214 exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 8

You have an existing field-based data flow that follows the LSA++ concept. To meet a new urgent business requirement for a field you want to leverage a hierarchy of an existing characteristic without changing the transformation. How can you achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

AAssociate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider

BAdd the characteristic to the DataStore object (advanced)

CAssociate the field with the characteristic In the Open ODS View

DAssign hierarchy properties to the field in the SW Query

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Dorothea at Dec 10, 2024, 01:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BW4H_214 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Viola

2 months ago

I'm with Shenika on this one. Option B is the way to go. Adding the characteristic to the DataStore object just seems like the cleanest, most efficient solution. Plus, it has the word 'advanced' in it, so you know it's legit.

upvoted 0 times

Linwood

1 months ago

I think we should go with Option B, adding the characteristic to the DataStore object seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

2 months ago

I'm not sure about Option D, assigning hierarchy properties to the field in the SW Query seems a bit complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

2 months ago

I think Option A could also work, associating the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darci

2 months ago

I agree with you, Option B does seem like the most efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denna

2 months ago

Haha, option A sounds like something a sorcerer would do! 'Associate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider' - what is this, magic? I'll pass on that one.

upvoted 0 times

Mammie

1 months ago

I'm not sure about option A either. I might go with option D to play it safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

2 months ago

Yeah, option A does seem a bit complex. I think I'll stick with option C for now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dwight

2 months ago

I agree, option A does sound like magic! I think I'll go with option B instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

3 months ago

I think B and D might work too, but A and C seem more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mendy

3 months ago

D is definitely out. Assigning hierarchy properties to the field in the SW Query? That's just too messy and convoluted. I'm leaning towards C as the better option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Associating the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider sounds like it could do the trick as well. Gotta weigh the pros and cons of each option.

upvoted 0 times

Roosevelt

2 months ago

Yeah, that could work too. But associating the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider seems simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charolette

2 months ago

I think adding the characteristic to the DataStore object might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

3 months ago

I think option B is the way to go. Adding the characteristic to the DataStore object seems like the most straightforward approach to leverage the hierarchy without modifying the transformation.

upvoted 0 times