New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BW4H_214 Topic 7 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BW4H_214 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 7
[All C_BW4H_214 Questions]

You have an existing field-based data flow that follows the LSA++ concept. To meet a new urgent business requirement for a field you want to leverage a hierarchy of an existing characteristic without changing the transformation. How can you achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Roselle at Aug 08, 2024, 07:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BW4H_214 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Deandrea
4 months ago
I'm not sure about option C) Associate the field with the characteristic In the Open ODS View. It doesn't seem like the most efficient way to achieve the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
4 months ago
I agree with Brittni. Those options make sense because they involve leveraging existing structures without changing the transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
4 months ago
I think the correct answers are A) Associate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider and B) Add the characteristic to the DataStore object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If it's an existing field-based data flow, then I'd say options A and C are the way to go. Gotta love those LSA++ concepts!
upvoted 0 times
Ashley
3 months ago
Yeah, I think option C could also work well in this situation. It's all about optimizing that data flow!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
3 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the best choice to leverage the hierarchy of an existing characteristic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corrina
4 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I feel like there's a hidden joke here, like option B is actually 'Add the characteristic to the DataStore object (with a unicorn)' or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
4 months ago
I'm going to go with options A and C. Associating the field with the characteristic in both the CompositeProvider and the Open ODS View should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Val
3 months ago
That sounds like a good plan. Associating the field in both the CompositeProvider and Open ODS View should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
3 months ago
I think options A and C are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elena
4 months ago
I think option D) Assign hierarchy properties to the field in the SW Query could also be a valid solution. It's worth considering as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
Option B sounds interesting, but it's labeled as 'advanced' so I'm not sure if that's the best approach for this urgent requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
4 months ago
B) Add the characteristic to the DataStore object (advanced)
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
4 months ago
A) Associate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phyliss
4 months ago
I'm not sure about option C) Associate the field with the characteristic In the Open ODS View. It doesn't seem like the best approach for leveraging a hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
5 months ago
I agree with Hana. Those options make sense because they both involve linking the field with the characteristic in some way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
5 months ago
I think the correct answers are A) Associate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider and B) Add the characteristic to the DataStore object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option C looks promising. Associating the field with the characteristic in the Open ODS View seems like a straightforward way to leverage the hierarchy without changing the transformation.
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
4 months ago
I think so too, it's a simple and effective solution to meet the urgent business requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
4 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for leveraging the hierarchy without changing the transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel