BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_ARCON_2308 Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ARCON_2308 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All C_ARCON_2308 Questions]

Suppliers and Users

You have created a custom group named "Indirect Contract Manager" and you want to link this group to a Contract Manager group.

How do you establish the Parent/Child relationship within groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Pearlie
6 months ago
I went with D too. It just fits better with the concept of establishing hierarchical relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
6 months ago
You know, this question reminds me of that time my boss thought adding a group as a user was the same as making it a child group. Good times, good times.
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
4 months ago
B) Create the Contract Manager group at the template level and add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a team member
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
Oh wow, that sounds like a confusing situation. It's important to understand the difference between adding a group as a user versus making it a child group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
5 months ago
B) Create the Contract Manager group at the template level and add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a team member
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
5 months ago
A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
6 months ago
I initially thought B might be correct. Adding the group at the template level sounded plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
6 months ago
I was torn between A and D. But D does seem like the more logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
6 months ago
I agree with user2. It makes the most sense to create a Parent/Child relationship that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
6 months ago
Haha, imagine if we added the Indirect Contract Manager as a team member to the Contract Manager group. That would be a recipe for chaos!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
6 months ago
I agree with Kaycee. Adding the Indirect Contract Manager as a child to the Contract Manager group is the way to establish the Parent/Child relationship.
upvoted 0 times
Bok
5 months ago
A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
5 months ago
D) Add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a child group to the Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
6 months ago
A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
6 months ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Why would we add the Indirect Contract Manager as a child to the Contract Manager group? That doesn't make much sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
6 months ago
Yeah, a bit. I think the answer is D. Add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a child group to the Contract Manager group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
6 months ago
Did anyone find the question about linking the 'Indirect Contract Manager' group confusing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
7 months ago
Actually, I think B) Create the Contract Manager group at the template level and add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a team member makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
7 months ago
No, I believe it's D) Add the Indirect Contract Manager group as a child group to the Contract Manager group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
7 months ago
I think the answer is A) Add the Contract Manager group as a child group to the Indirect Contract Manager group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel