A client is running a project with a 626 multi-cloud setup involving Marketing Cloud, Sales Cloud, ServiceCloud, Experience Cloud, and MuleSoft. Currently, MuleSoft is primarily used to integrate with third-party systems. Marketing Cloud is connected to Sales/Service using the standard connector. A recent requirement-gathering session, involving all functional streams, brought up the question of where consolidated reporting mil happen. So far, reporting has only been looked at individually per stream.
There is a steering committee meeting 1 week from now. The Solution Architect was asked to provide different solutions to fix the problem. The expectation is that a high-level evaluation will be done prior the steering committee meeting so that an indication of options can be given and additional funding can be requested.
Which three critical steps should the Solution Architect take first?
Choose 3 answers
For a multi-cloud setup involving various Salesforce clouds and MuleSoft, understanding the current data architecture and the need behind consolidated reporting is crucial. Reviewing established and planned data flows provides insight into the existing data landscape, identifying systems of record and current data integrations. Identifying the key drivers and high-level data scope for consolidated reporting helps in aligning reporting solutions with business needs. Drafting a high-level solution using CRM Analytics (formerly known as Einstein Analytics) showcases the potential for unified reporting across multiple Salesforce clouds, leveraging its powerful data integration, transformation, and visualization capabilities. This approach aligns with Salesforce's best practices for data management and analytics, providing a foundation for informed decision-making in the steering committee meeting.
Universal Containers is in the process of implementing a CPQ and B2B Commerce solution. The Technology team hascompleted the development for the current sprint and is demonstrating the functionalities to the business stakeholders during their sprint demo. While demonstrating products and pricing, and Sync between B2B and CPQ when requesting a quote, the stakeholders make a new request to include tiered pricing and map it to discount schedules on CPQ.
Which approach should a Solution Architect recommend while addressing the feedback from the stakeholders?
CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is a tool that synchronizes data from CPQ product and pricing objects to B2B Commerce objects1.
CPQ uses discount schedules and B2B Commerce uses tiered pricing to handle volume-based pricing23.
The connector does not support mapping tiered pricing to discount schedules out of the box23.
The connector uses pricing from B2B Commerce to define the pricing on the generated quote lines by setting their Special Price fields4.
Incorporating new requirements, such as tiered pricing and mapping to discount schedules in CPQ, into an ongoing Salesforce CPQ and B2B Commerce project requires careful consideration of project scope, timelines, and resource availability. Adding the new requirement as a user story to the product backlog allows for a structured approach to evaluating its impact on the project. Scheduling a subsequent meeting for prioritization and grooming ensures that stakeholders can discuss the new requirement in detail, assess its feasibility, and decide on its inclusion in the project timeline. This approach aligns with agile project management best practices, allowing for flexibility in responding to new requirements while maintaining project focus and efficiency.
Northern Trail Outfitters (WTO) has around 500,000 active customers stored m the Account object. NTO gets an average of two orders per customer each month from both internal and online sales channels. NTO is expecting growth of 15% year-over-year (YoY). Various NTO users have recently started complaining about slower performances while accessing order information or running reports. NTO customers are also teeing slower responses while accessingtheir order history on B2B Commerce.
Which two options should a Solution Architect consider to improve performance'
Choose 2 answers
To address performance issues at Northern Trail Outfitters, developing an archiving strategy for older order records can significantly improve system responsiveness by reducing the volume of data actively queried and processed. Additionally, leveraging external objects to manage order data, especially for historical or less frequently accessed records, can further alleviate the load on Salesforce's core databases, improving performance for both internal users and B2B Commerce customers.
Universal Containers has recently provided its call center team the ability to troubleshoot issues coming from its B2B Commerce customers. Currently, the team utilises Service Cloud and, specifically, the Service Console. The CIO s concern is now different the experience will be as it relates to B2B Commerce for Visualforce versus what the team sees today within the Service Console.
Which recommendation should the Solution Architect voice to the CIO to ensure higher adoption by the call center team?
To ensure high adoption by the call center team and maintain consistency in their experience, providing direct access to B2B Commerce data, such as customer carts, within the Service Console is essential. This approach allows agents to view relevant B2B Commerce information seamlessly within their familiar Service Console environment, enabling efficient issue resolution and enhancing customer support. This solution leverages the integrated capabilities of Salesforce to unify customer data across platforms, aligning with best practices for a cohesive user experience and efficient service delivery.
Universal Containers (UC) is evaluating Salesforce for a Lead to Invoice solution, as its current process for getting payments from customers s incredibly laborious. UC knows now its current invoice process runs through its back-office ERP, and is unsure how it would work within a front-office tool going from a lead all the way to an invoice. UC is looking to purchase Revenue Cloud, Sales Cloud, Marketing Cloud Account engagement, and MuleSoft to work with its CRP. The CIO also wants to make sure UC is utilizing the data across these clouds in the most automated way possible without a lot of manual data intervention as is required today within its back- office CRP
What should thesteps in the business process look like when creating a multi-cloud Lead to Invoice solution in Salesforce if UC's CRP will be the system of record for invoices?
This option would follow the lead-to-invoice process that Salesforce Billing supports2, which involves creating an invoice from an order and then sending it to theERP system for payment processing. This option would also leverage Revenue Cloud and Sales Cloud features such as CPQ and Billing to automate and streamline the quoting and invoicing process.
Since UC's CRP will be the system of record for invoices, the order information will need to be passed to the back-office ERP for invoice creation and processing. Therefore, the business process should include Lead, Opportunity, Quote, Order, and then directly into the back-office ERP system. Payment processing can behandled within the back-office system or potentially integrated back into Salesforce with appropriate consideration for data security and compliance.
Sommer
4 days agoPauline
7 days agoBrittney
19 days agoTaryn
1 months agoEvette
1 months agoAngella
2 months agoJenelle
2 months agoSabine
2 months agoMabelle
2 months agoMargret
3 months agoMelina
4 months agoMalika
5 months agoGilbert
5 months agoDorothea
5 months ago