Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 5 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 5
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has been tracking the details of its storage facilities in an Excel sheet, where each facility is represented as a row and the details about each facility are represented by columns.

How should CK store this information in Salesforce?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best way to store the information of Cloud Kicks' storage facilities in Salesforce is to use objects to represent storage facilities and fields to store facility details.This is because objects and fields in Salesforce are analogous to database tables and columns, respectively1.Each object contains a set of fields that store data values, and each record is an instance of an object1. Therefore, if Cloud Kicks wants to store the same information that they have in their Excel sheet, they can create a custom object called Storage Facility, and add fields for each detail that they want to track, such as location, capacity, inventory, and so on. Then, they can create records for each storage facility and populate the fields with the corresponding data.This way, they can store and manage their data in a structured and consistent way, and leverage the features and benefits of Salesforce, such as reports, dashboards, automation, and security23.

Using objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities is not a valid option, as it does not make sense to use objects as data values.Objects are meant to represent entities or concepts, not attributes or properties1. Using objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details is also not a good option, as it would create unnecessary complexity and redundancy in the data model.Objects can be related to each other through various types of relationships, such as lookup, master-detail, or many-to-many4. However, in this case, there is no need to create a separate object for each facility detail, as they are not independent entities, but rather characteristics of the storage facilities.Creating a separate object for each detail would also require creating more fields, records, and relationships, which would increase the maintenance and storage costs, and reduce the performance and usability of the system5.Reference:

Learn All About Objects and Fields in Salesforce - Forcetalks

Mastering Salesforce CRM Administration - Packt Subscription

Overview of Salesforce Objects and Fields

Object Reference for the Salesforce Platform

Understand Custom & Standard Objects Unit | Salesforce Trailhead


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mel
28 days ago
I'm going with Option C. It's the most logical and efficient way to structure the data. Although, I do have to wonder about that company name...
upvoted 0 times
Amie
3 days ago
I think Option C makes sense. It separates the storage facilities from their details.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
1 months ago
Option B is the way to go, but I have to say - 'Cloud Kicks'? Really? Who came up with that name?
upvoted 0 times
Emerson
21 days ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
23 days ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
Option A seems a bit convoluted. Why not just have one object for the whole shebang? Keep it simple, CK!
upvoted 0 times
Blair
17 days ago
User 4: I think Option A could work if CK wants to have more flexibility in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
21 days ago
User 3: Option C might work too, it depends on how detailed the facility details are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
25 days ago
User 2: I agree, having separate objects for each makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
30 days ago
User 1: Option B seems like the best choice. It keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
1 months ago
But wouldn't it be more organized to have separate objects for storage facilities and facility details? (C)
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
2 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. It's more straightforward to have storage facilities as the main object and facility details as fields.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
13 days ago
Definitely, having storage facilities as the main object makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
15 days ago
I agree with you, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
19 days ago
C) Objects to represent storage facilities and fields to store facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
28 days ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 months ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristen
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe CK should use objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details (B)
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Having separate objects for storage facilities and facility details allows for better organization and easier data management.
upvoted 0 times
Salley
2 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Having separate objects for storage facilities and facility details allows for better organization and easier data management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
2 months ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
2 months ago
I think CK should use objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities (A)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel