Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

A UX Designer determines that the usability of their company's Salesforce org could be improved if there was a tight relationship between the objects Container and Container Bids. For example, Container Bids should be deleted automatically whenever its associated Container is deleted.

Which type of relationship should be used to optimize the link between Container and Container Bids?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sheldon
5 months ago
I'm going with A) Master-Detail. It's like a parent and their kids - when the parent's gone, the kids gotta go too. Keeps the family tree nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Oretha
3 months ago
Gregoria: Absolutely, it will help keep everything organized and prevent any orphaned records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to maintain that tight connection between Container and Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
Yeah, it's like a parent-child relationship. Makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
I agree with A) Master-Detail. It's the cleanest way to ensure data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
5 months ago
I believe Many-to-one-Lookup might be a better option to maintain flexibility in the relationship between Container and Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Hierarchical Lookup could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
5 months ago
I agree with Ressie, Master-Detail would ensure the automatic deletion of Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
5 months ago
Definitely a Master-Detail relationship. It's like when you're cleaning your room and you find a bunch of old receipts - you just toss the whole stack, not just one by one. Efficient and satisfying!
upvoted 0 times
Joaquin
4 months ago
B) Hierarchical Lookup
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
4 months ago
Exactly! Master-Detail is the way to go for that kind of relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
5 months ago
A) Master-Detail
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronika
5 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking a Hierarchical Lookup might work, but a Master-Detail relationship makes more sense. It's like a container and its contents - you wouldn't want to keep the contents around if the container is gone, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
5 months ago
A master-detail relationship is the way to go here. It ensures that the Container Bids are deleted when their parent Container is deleted. Keeps things tidy and organized, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lonna
4 months ago
B: Yeah, it makes sense to use Master-Detail to keep everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
5 months ago
A: I think a Master-Detail relationship is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
6 months ago
I think the relationship should be Master-Detail.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel