Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam

Question #: 28
Topic #: 8

[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

At Universal Containers, there's a team of auditors distributed throughout the organization that all need access to high-value opportunities.

With a Private sharing model, which option should an architect recommend when designing a solution for this requirement?

ACreate a criteria-based sharing rule to grant a public group access to high-value opportunities.

BAdd the auditors to the default Opportunity Team.

CPut the auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Deeanna at Dec 25, 2023, 05:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Johnetta

1 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Who needs a fancy 'criteria-based sharing rule' when you can just be the boss? Unless, of course, the auditors are also the boss. Then we've got a real power struggle on our hands!

upvoted 0 times

Belen

22 days ago

C is definitely the way to go. It's all about that hierarchy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

25 days ago

B) Add the auditors to the default Opportunity Team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

28 days ago

C) Put the auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

1 months ago

You know, if I were an auditor, I'd just hack the system and give myself access. But I guess that's not the kind of 'solution' you're looking for. Anyway, I think A is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

1 months ago

Hold up, are we sure C is the right choice? Putting them at the top of the Role Hierarchy could cause some serious organizational headaches. I'd go with A - a criteria-based sharing rule sounds like the cleanest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonzo

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure B is the best option. Putting them in the Role Hierarchy at the top level seems more efficient. C looks like the winner to me.

upvoted 0 times

Harrison

1 days ago

But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule with a public group also work? A seems like a viable option as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

17 days ago

I think C is the best option too. It ensures the auditors have access to all high-value opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

2 months ago

But wouldn't adding auditors to the default Opportunity Team provide them with direct access?

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

2 months ago

I think B is the way to go. Adding the auditors to the Opportunity Team makes the most sense to give them the access they need.

upvoted 0 times

Chun

16 days ago

True, it's important to consider the level of access needed for each user.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirby

1 months ago

I think putting them at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy might be too broad of access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilburn

2 months ago

But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule also work for this scenario?

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

2 months ago

I agree, adding them to the Opportunity Team would be the most efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C is better as it ensures auditors have access at the highest level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

2 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to grant access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

2 months ago

That's a good point, but wouldn't adding them to the default Opportunity Team provide more flexibility?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go as it ensures the auditors have access at the highest level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to determine access.

upvoted 0 times

...