Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers has requirement to integrate Salesforce with an external system to control record access.

What option should the Architect consider when designing a solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tamekia at Nov 18, 2024, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Maryanne
2 months ago
B) is the clear winner here. Maintaining the SObject_share records directly is the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
1 months ago
Let's go with option B) then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 months ago
It's definitely the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
Agreed, using the SOAP API to maintain SObject_share records is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 months ago
I think B) is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
3 months ago
I agree with Bethanie, option A seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the architect is really wishing they had a time machine to avoid this integration nightmare. But seriously, I think B) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
3 months ago
I'd go with D). Creating new sharing rules seems like the most straightforward solution to control record access between the two systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
3 months ago
B) sounds like the way to go. Modifying the role hierarchy or metadata could have unintended consequences, and creating new sharing rules is overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 months ago
D) Creating new sharing rules might be too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
2 months ago
A) Modifying the role hierarchy could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
B) Use the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bethanie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
3 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel