BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 2 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 2
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers uses Standard WorkOrder object to track various work orders sent to field agents. Currently, the WorkOrder object has more than 400 fields. There are eight different types of work order processes established. The Director of Customer Service wants to ensure that field agents gets to see only required information specific to the WorkOrder type they are addressing.

Which option is recommended to implement this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nell at Sep 15, 2024, 06:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Emilio
26 days ago
Option A? Seriously? Who wants to deal with custom LWCs when you can just use out-of-the-box features? *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
9 days ago
C) Use Dynamic form to add different page sections and control visibility of sections by Work Order RecordType value
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
12 days ago
B) Use different page layouts per work order type with different sections representing key information about the specific work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
18 days ago
A) Use a custom LWC to override the view action of WorkOrder with custom metadata type defining relevant fields per WorkOrder type
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
1 months ago
B or C both seem like viable options. I'm leaning towards C - the Dynamic form approach has a certain je ne sais quoi, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
1 months ago
Hmm, using a custom LWC to override the view action? Sounds a bit complex. I'd stick with the simpler options like B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
1 months ago
I like the idea of using Dynamic form to control the visibility of sections based on the Work Order RecordType. That's a smart and flexible solution.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
17 days ago
C) Use Dynamic form to add different page sections and control visibility of sections by Work Order RecordType value
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
22 days ago
B) Use different page layouts per work order type with different sections representing key information about the specific work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
25 days ago
A) Use a custom LWC to override the view action of WorkOrder with custom metadata type defining relevant fields per WorkOrder type
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
1 months ago
I personally prefer option B as it simplifies the process by using different page layouts per work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Leveraging different page layouts per work order type is a clean and straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
25 days ago
I agree, it would make it easier for field agents to focus on the relevant information for each work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
27 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Leveraging different page layouts per work order type is a clean and straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it dynamically controls visibility based on RecordType value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for customization based on WorkOrder type.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel