Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 1
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

A banking company wants their customers Date of Birth Field searchable by Banking Reps, but only editable by Customer Support Reps.

Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Margot
2 months ago
Haha, I hope the banking company's customers don't have the same birthday as their support reps. That could get awkward!
upvoted 0 times
Raina
18 days ago
A: Definitely, we wouldn't want any mix-ups with birthdays!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
19 days ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It ensures that only Customer Support Reps can edit the Date of Birth field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 months ago
A: Option B sounds like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. It's the most elegant and secure solution to meet the banking company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
2 months ago
I like the idea of adding the field to the Search layout in option C, but making it required for the Customer Support Reps could cause issues. I'd prefer the read-only approach in option B.
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
1 months ago
That could work too, as long as it's read-only for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
But what about making it visible in the search layout for Banking Reps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
Agreed, setting the field as read-only for Banking Reps makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
I think option B is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
3 months ago
Option A sounds like a clever solution, but I'm not sure a validation rule is the best approach here. A field-level security setting seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
2 months ago
Yeah, I think Option B would be the best approach to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
2 months ago
I agree, setting field-level security seems like a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
2 months ago
Option A sounds like a clever solution, but I'm not sure a validation rule is the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
3 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It ensures the field is visible to both profiles but only editable by the Customer Support Reps.
upvoted 0 times
Coletta
2 months ago
It's a good balance between visibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
That way, they can search for the Date of Birth but not make any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
2 months ago
Setting the field as visible but read-only for Banking Reps makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corrina
3 months ago
I agree, setting the field level security seems like the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
I think option B is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel