Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Timothy at Sep 14, 2024, 12:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Iola
2 months ago
A and B for sure. Although I'm curious if C involves some sort of maple syrup embargo. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
D is obviously the correct answer. Loss of contracts? That's the real risk companies should be worried about. *chuckles* Unless they're planning to go 'off the grid' completely.
upvoted 0 times
Agustin
29 days ago
Definitely, it's important for companies to track and report their greenhouse gases to avoid losing contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
Yeah, it could really impact a company's bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 months ago
I agree, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions is a big risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
2 months ago
This seems like a no-brainer. Who cares about Canada? A and B are the clear winners here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
2 months ago
I agree, A and B are the key points. Not reporting emissions could seriously hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
1 months ago
I agree, A and B are the key points. Not reporting emissions could seriously hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
2 months ago
And we could lose contracts with companies that track emissions. That's a big risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Customers might go for products that are seen as more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
3 months ago
I think not tracking greenhouse gases can make investors see us as riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
3 months ago
A and B seem like the most significant risks. Investors and customers are really driving the push for environmental accountability these days.
upvoted 0 times
Oneida
2 months ago
Definitely, not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can have serious consequences for a company's reputation and bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
Customers are also more likely to support companies that are transparent about their environmental practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
Yes, it's important for companies to track and report their greenhouse gas emissions to maintain investor confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
I agree, investors are becoming more conscious of companies' environmental impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel