Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Salesforce Discussions
Exam Salesforce-Net-Zero-Cloud Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion
Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Net-Zero-Cloud Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion
Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional Exam exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional Exam Questions]
What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)
A
Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
B
Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment
C
Product sales may be blocked in Canada
D
Loss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
B, D
by
Rima
at
Jul 15, 2024, 06:12 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium Salesforce-Net-Zero-Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Emile
8 days ago
Nah man, C is legit. You know Canada's got some strict environmental regulations, eh? Gotta keep an eye on that, eh?
upvoted
0
times
...
Huey
10 days ago
Haha, C is a bit random. 'Product sales may be blocked in Canada' - what's that all aboot, eh?
upvoted
0
times
...
Quiana
14 days ago
D is an interesting one too. Can't ignore the supply chain implications of not tracking scope 2 emissions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Monroe
25 days ago
I agree, A and B are the big ones. Not reporting could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line these days.
upvoted
0
times
Erick
6 days ago
I agree, A and B are the big ones. Not reporting could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line these days.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ardella
7 days ago
B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment
upvoted
0
times
...
Rasheeda
10 days ago
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Angella
26 days ago
I agree, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could hurt sales.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rebecka
30 days ago
Customers might go for products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ressie
1 months ago
A and B seem like the most important risks. Investors and customers are key stakeholders that will care about emissions reporting.
upvoted
0
times
Tammy
25 days ago
Yes, not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can definitely impact investor confidence and customer loyalty.
upvoted
0
times
...
Arlean
26 days ago
A and B seem like the most important risks. Investors and customers are key stakeholders that will care about emissions reporting.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Tawanna
2 months ago
Yeah, investors may see non-reporting companies as riskier investments.
upvoted
0
times
...
Julio
2 months ago
I think not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can be risky.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Emile
8 days agoHuey
10 days agoQuiana
14 days agoMonroe
25 days agoErick
6 days agoArdella
7 days agoRasheeda
10 days agoAngella
26 days agoRebecka
30 days agoRessie
1 months agoTammy
25 days agoArlean
26 days agoTawanna
2 months agoJulio
2 months ago