Salesforce Exam Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud exam

Question #: 32
Topic #: 3

[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

AInvestors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier

BCustomers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment

CProduct sales may be blocked in Canada

DLoss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Rima at Jul 15, 2024, 06:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Emile

3 months ago

Nah man, C is legit. You know Canada's got some strict environmental regulations, eh? Gotta keep an eye on that, eh?

upvoted 0 times

Wenona

2 months ago

Investors may see it as a red flag if companies are not transparent about their emissions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tula

2 months ago

Definitely, it's important to stay compliant with regulations to avoid any issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

2 months ago

I agree, not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can lead to some serious consequences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynna

2 months ago

Yeah, Canada does not mess around with their environmental rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

3 months ago

Haha, C is a bit random. 'Product sales may be blocked in Canada' - what's that all aboot, eh?

upvoted 0 times

...

Quiana

3 months ago

D is an interesting one too. Can't ignore the supply chain implications of not tracking scope 2 emissions.

upvoted 0 times

Eleonore

2 months ago

Yeah, not tracking scope 2 emissions could really impact our contracts with other companies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

2 months ago

I agree, D is definitely important to consider when it comes to tracking emissions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Monroe

3 months ago

I agree, A and B are the big ones. Not reporting could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line these days.

upvoted 0 times

Erick

3 months ago

I agree, A and B are the big ones. Not reporting could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line these days.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

3 months ago

B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

3 months ago

A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier

upvoted 0 times

...

Angella

3 months ago

I agree, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could hurt sales.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebecka

4 months ago

Customers might go for products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

4 months ago

A and B seem like the most important risks. Investors and customers are key stakeholders that will care about emissions reporting.

upvoted 0 times

Tammy

3 months ago

Yes, not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can definitely impact investor confidence and customer loyalty.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

3 months ago

A and B seem like the most important risks. Investors and customers are key stakeholders that will care about emissions reporting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

4 months ago

Yeah, investors may see non-reporting companies as riskier investments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

4 months ago

I think not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can be risky.

upvoted 0 times

...