Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Topic 1 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tyisha
6 months ago
As an environmental scientist, I can tell you that the risks of not tracking greenhouse gases are no laughing matter. A and B for sure, and maybe D too. Gotta take this stuff seriously.
upvoted 0 times
Victor
4 months ago
We need to prioritize tracking and reporting greenhouse gases to mitigate these risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
4 months ago
Definitely, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions would be a big blow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
Customers are becoming more conscious of environmental impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
I agree, investors don't want to take unnecessary risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diego
6 months ago
Haha, C is just random. Product sales blocked in Canada? That's a bit of a stretch. I'm going with A and B.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
4 months ago
It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to potential risks for the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
Yeah, I think investors and customers are the main concerns when it comes to not tracking greenhouse gases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
I agree, C does seem unlikely. A and B are definitely more realistic risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
5 months ago
It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to potential risks for the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
5 months ago
Yeah, I think investors and customers are the main concerns when it comes to not tracking greenhouse gases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
5 months ago
I agree, C does seem unlikely. A and B are definitely more realistic risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eva
6 months ago
And losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could hurt sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
6 months ago
D is also a good option. Lots of companies are tracking their scope 2 emissions these days, so not reporting your own could cost you some lucrative contracts.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
5 months ago
D) Loss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
6 months ago
Customers might go for products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
7 months ago
I think A and B are the clear risks here. Investors and customers are increasingly focused on sustainability, so not reporting greenhouse gases could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
Tamera
5 months ago
Losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could really impact a company's revenue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
That's true, companies need to be transparent about their environmental impact to stay competitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
5 months ago
Customers might also choose products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
6 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
6 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
6 months ago
I agree, not reporting greenhouse gases could definitely make investors see a company as riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonell
7 months ago
Yeah, investors may see non-reporting companies as riskier investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
7 months ago
I think not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel