BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II Questions]

Two APIs are deployed to a two-node on-prem cluster. Due to a requirements change, the two APIs must communicate to exchange data asynchronously.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To communicate asynchronously between two APIs deployed to a two-node on-prem cluster, the developer can use the VM Connector if the two APIs use the same domain. The VM Connector allows passing messages between different Mule applications within a single Mule runtime instance or across different instances using shared memory or persistent storage. If two APIs are deployed under the same domain, they can share resources such as VM queues and communicate asynchronously using VM Connector operations. Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/vm-connector https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/shared-resources


by Dalene at Jul 09, 2024, 05:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Janey
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is option A. The VM Connector is designed for exactly this kind of inter-application communication scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to go with option B just to mess with the graders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Instead of using the VM Connector, we should use a direct flow-ref to enable the communication between the APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
Option D seems more plausible to me. The APIs are running in a cluster mode, and each node has its own set of VM Queues, so the VM Connector can't be used.
upvoted 0 times
Socorro
2 months ago
Yes, you're right. Using the VM Connector in this scenario would not work due to the separate VM Queues for each node in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
Option D seems more plausible to me. The APIs are running in a cluster mode, and each node has its own set of VM Queues, so the VM Connector can't be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D makes sense since each mode has its own set of VM Queues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
4 months ago
I think option A is correct. The VM Connector can be used to enable communication between the two APIs since they are on the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
Shoshana
2 months ago
It seems like the decision depends on the specific requirements of the APIs and their communication needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
2 months ago
Option C suggests using directly instead of the VM Connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
But what if the VM Connector is not suitable for inter-application communication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
3 months ago
I think option A is correct. The VM Connector can be used to enable communication between the two APIs since they are on the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it directly references the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because the APIs are in the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel