BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 9
[All Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Questions]

An organization is beginning to follow Mulesoft's recommended API led connectivity approach to use modern API to support the development and lifecycle of the integration solutions and to close the IT delivery gap.

What distinguishes between how modern API's are organized in a MuleSoft recommended API-led connectivity approach as compared to other common enterprise integration solutions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Correct answer is The API interfaces are specified at a granularity intended for developers to consume specific aspect of integration processes


by Jules at Sep 17, 2024, 12:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Paul
25 days ago
Haha, Jules's 'Integrate All the Things!' approach sounds a lot like the old school enterprise integration solutions they're trying to move away from. Good call on Option B!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
27 days ago
Wait, does this mean I can't use my 'Integrate All the Things!' approach anymore? Darn it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
28 days ago
Options C and D also sound like they could be correct, but Option B really captures the essence of the 'API-led connectivity' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
18 days ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the key difference in how modern APIs are organized in a MuleSoft recommended API-led connectivity approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerrod
1 months ago
I believe that having API implementations built with standards and centralized configuration management tools is also crucial for ensuring consistency and efficiency in the integration solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
1 months ago
I agree with Art, having APIs specified at a granular level makes it easier for developers to work with and understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
I agree with Harrison. Option B is the best answer as it aligns with the MuleSoft recommended approach of providing APIs that target specific integration needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice here. Modern APIs should be designed at a granular level to allow developers to easily consume specific aspects of the integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
12 days ago
Merilyn: And it aligns well with the API-led connectivity approach recommended by MuleSoft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
13 days ago
Definitely, it allows for more flexibility and reusability in the integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
18 days ago
I agree, option B makes sense. Granular APIs are easier for developers to work with.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
2 months ago
I think the key difference is that API interfaces are specified at a granularity intended for developers to consume specific aspect of integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel