Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce-MuleSoft-Developer-I Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer I exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer I Questions]

Refer to the below exhibit.

A Mule application configures a property placeholder file named config.yaml to set some property placeholders for an HTTP connector.

What is the valid properties placeholder file to set these values?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Correct answer is as below as it follows the correct syntax.

http:

basepath: 'api'

host : 'localhost'

port : '8081'

Mule Doc Reference :https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/mule-app-properties-to-configure


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leigha
3 months ago
Option A? More like option 'Nah' if you ask me. That's just too basic to be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
3 months ago
Option C is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. It's just not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 months ago
C: Option D seems to have the correct structure with the http, basePath, port, and host properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
2 months ago
B: I agree, it looks like it's missing the proper syntax for setting property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
2 months ago
A: Option C is definitely not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
3 months ago
Option D has a bit too much JSON formatting, it's a bit overkill for this simple task. I'd go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
2 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leana
3 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the most complete and organized approach to setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, Option B looks well-structured and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
3 months ago
User 1: I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerry
3 months ago
Option B looks more comprehensive and structured. It clearly defines the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
2 months ago
Yes, option B provides a clear layout of the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 months ago
I would go with option B for setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
2 months ago
Yes, option B seems to be the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most structured and easy to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
3 months ago
Option B has the basepath, host, and port clearly defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
I agree, option B looks more structured and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel