New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MarketingAssociate Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MarketingAssociate exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce MarketingAssociate Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has a very important new product launch coming up. CK has built an informative email to maximize awareness and interest. Management refused a giveaway as part of the campaign, but not deep discounts.

Which potential option violates CAN-SPAM specifications on subject lines?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Option C, 'You may have just won a $500 gift card!', potentially violates CAN-SPAM specifications on subject lines because it can be considered misleading or deceptive. CAN-SPAM regulations require that subject lines accurately reflect the content of the email. Misleading subject lines that imply the recipient has won a prize when this is not the case can lead to violations of these regulations, potentially resulting in penalties. It's crucial for marketing communications to be transparent and not mislead recipients about the nature of the email content.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Irving
6 months ago
Option A seems like the safest choice then. It simply promotes the product without making any false claims or false sense of urgency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
6 months ago
That's a good point, Rasheeda. CAN-SPAM prohibits false or misleading subject lines, so option B might not be compliant either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
6 months ago
But isn't option B also a violation? It creates a sense of urgency that could be considered deceptive.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
6 months ago
Haha, giveaways and deep discounts? Sounds like CK is trying to pull a fast one on their customers. Option C is just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
6 months ago
I agree with Alease. Option C may mislead recipients and is not allowed under CAN-SPAM regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
6 months ago
I think Option A is the safest bet. It's informative without being deceptive or trying to create a false sense of urgency.
upvoted 0 times
Domingo
5 months ago
I agree, Option A is the best way to go. It's important to stay compliant with CAN-SPAM regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
Option A is definitely the safest choice. It's straightforward and doesn't seem misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
6 months ago
I think option C violates CAN-SPAM because it includes a false claim of winning a gift card.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
6 months ago
Option B seems a bit sketchy to me. Telling people to reply ASAP for the 'best deal' sounds like a tactic to pressure them.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
5 months ago
I agree, it's important to be careful with subject lines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
5 months ago
Yeah, it could come off as spammy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
5 months ago
Option B does seem a bit pushy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
5 months ago
I agree, it's better to avoid that kind of language in emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
5 months ago
Yeah, it could come off as spammy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
6 months ago
Option B does seem a bit pushy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaunna
6 months ago
Option C definitely violates the CAN-SPAM act. You can't just claim someone has won a prize without being truthful.
upvoted 0 times
Mable
6 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
6 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
6 months ago
C) You may have just won a $500 gift card!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
6 months ago
B) IMPORTANT: Please reply ASAP for the best deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
6 months ago
A) You don't want to miss our newest product
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
Option B seems fine too, urgency can be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
7 months ago
I would go with option A, it's straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
7 months ago
Yeah, C is definitely not allowed. It's misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
7 months ago
I think option C violates CAN-SPAM Act.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel