Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Data-Cloud Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce-Data-Cloud exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

An administrator wants to be able to create a multi-dimensional metric to identify unified individual lifetime value (LTV). Which sequence of DMO joins are necessary within the Calculated Insight to enable this calculation?

AUnified Individual > Individual > Sales Order

BUnified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order

CSales Order > Unified Individual

DSales Order > Individual > Unified Individual

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

To create a multi-dimensional metric to identify unified individual lifetime value (LTV), the administrator needs to join the following data model objects (DMOs) in the Calculated Insight:

Unified Individual: This DMO represents the unified profile of an individual, which contains attributes from multiple sources.

Unified Link Individual: This DMO represents the link between an Individual DMO and a Unified Individual DMO.

Sales Order: This DMO represents a transaction or purchase made by an individual.

The sequence of joins should start from the Unified Individual DMO, then join the Unified Link Individual DMO using the UnifiedIndividualId field, and then join the Sales Order DMO using the IndividualId field. This way, the administrator can access the sales order data for each unified individual and calculate their lifetime value.

by Elvera at Mar 10, 2024, 07:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce-Data-Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Laurene

6 months ago

That's a valid point. Maybe D) Sales Order > Individual > Unified Individual could be the correct sequence for the multi-dimensional metric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

6 months ago

But if we start with the Unified Individual, wouldn't it be more logical to follow through with Individual before Sales Order?

upvoted 0 times

...

Deonna

6 months ago

This question is making my head spin. I'm going to go with option B, but I might need a calculator and a crystal ball to figure it out.

upvoted 0 times

Vanna

5 months ago

I think option B makes sense too, let's go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

5 months ago

I agree, I'm also leaning towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

5 months ago

This question seems complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

6 months ago

I am leaning towards C) Sales Order > Unified Individual. It seems to make more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurene

6 months ago

I disagree. I believe the correct sequence is B) Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

6 months ago

Wait, are we supposed to be able to understand this question? I'm just going to randomly pick an answer and hope for the best. Maybe D, because who doesn't love a good 'Individual > Unified Individual' move?

upvoted 0 times

Ruthann

6 months ago

I'm going with A, Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

6 months ago

I think it's B, Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

6 months ago

I'll go with C, Sales Order > Unified Individual seems like a straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vesta

6 months ago

I'm going with A, Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order sounds logical to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

6 months ago

I think it's B, the Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order seems like the right sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

6 months ago

I agree with Francisca. I think the correct sequence should involve linking Unified Individuals first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

6 months ago

I think the answer is A) Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

7 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option C might be the way to go. Starting with Sales Order and then working up to Unified Individual could work, right?

upvoted 0 times

Lonny

6 months ago

I agree, starting with Sales Order and then moving to Unified Individual seems like the logical sequence to calculate LTV.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

6 months ago

I think option C makes sense. Starting with Sales Order and then linking to Unified Individual could work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

7 months ago

Well, I think we need to link Unified Individuals before considering Sales Orders to calculate lifetime value accurately.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kami

7 months ago

Option A looks good to me. Joining Unified Individual, Individual, and Sales Order seems like the logical way to go about this.

upvoted 0 times

Iola

6 months ago

I agree, Option A seems like the most logical sequence of joins to calculate the unified individual lifetime value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

6 months ago

Option A looks good to me. Joining Unified Individual, Individual, and Sales Order seems like the logical way to go about this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

7 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. The sequence of DMO joins should start with Unified Individual, then Unified Link Individual, and finally Sales Order to enable the calculation of unified individual lifetime value.

upvoted 0 times