Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Communications-Cloud Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud Accredited Professional (AP) Exam exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 4

[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Accredited Professional (AP) Exam Questions]

A company is selling voice products to business customers. The offer allows customers to select devices of various models. The product modeler intends to create a phone add-on product specification with voice offers with a cardinality that allows up to 700. Which of the three statement are valid regarding the product model in this scenario?

ASince the product model uses OOTB feature of EPC, MACD operations and decomposition are guaranteed to work well

BModeling children with large cardinalities can result in processing inefficiencies for MACD operations.

CProduct Model use hierarchical modeling which is natively supports EPC

DProduct model uses OOTB features from EPC. Decomposition may fail when the maximum number of products is processed.

EThis type of modeling is not supported in EPC and modular should follow a flat modelling technique.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Niesha at Jun 01, 2024, 10:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce-Communications-Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Paola

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class. *laughs* Gonna have to go with my gut and say B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

2 months ago

This question is making my head spin! All these acronyms and technical terms. I'm just going to guess and say A. Seems like a safe bet.

upvoted 0 times

Justine

1 months ago

I'm not sure about that. B also seems plausible, mentioning that modeling children with large cardinalities can cause processing inefficiencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

1 months ago

I think A is a good choice too. It mentions that the product model uses OOTB feature of EPC, which sounds important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

2 months ago

I'll have to go with C. Product Model uses hierarchical modeling, which is natively supported in EPC. Seems like a straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamar

2 months ago

D looks good to me. OOTB features from EPC may struggle when the maximum number of products is processed. Decomposition could be an issue.

upvoted 0 times

Irene

2 months ago

User 3: Yes, it's crucial to ensure that the product model can handle the processing efficiently to avoid any issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

2 months ago

User 2: I agree. It's important to consider potential issues with decomposition when dealing with large cardinalities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

2 months ago

User 1: D looks good to me. OOTB features from EPC may struggle when the maximum number of products is processed. Decomposition could be an issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

2 months ago

User 3: Product model use hierarchical modeling which is natively supports EPC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

2 months ago

User 2: I agree, modeling children with large cardinalities can result in processing inefficiencies for MACD operations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oretha

2 months ago

User 1: D looks good to me. OOTB features from EPC may struggle when the maximum number of products is processed. Decomposition could be an issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is more accurate. Decomposition may fail when the maximum number of products is processed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

3 months ago

I think option B is valid because modeling children with large cardinalities can indeed result in processing inefficiencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiera

3 months ago

Option B seems like the most valid choice here. Modeling children with large cardinalities can definitely lead to processing inefficiencies for MACD operations.

upvoted 0 times