BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Platform Architect I Topic 5 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 5
[All MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions]

An organization wants to make sure only known partners can invoke the organization's APIs. To achieve this security goal, the organization wants to enforce a Client ID Enforcement policy in API Manager so that only registered partner applications can invoke the organization's APIs. In what type of API implementation does MuleSoft recommend adding an API proxy to enforce the Client ID Enforcement policy, rather than embedding the policy directly in the application's JVM?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Correct Answer : A Non-Mule application

*****************************************

>> All type of Mule applications (Mule 3/ Mule 4/ with APIkit/ with Custom Java Code etc) running on Mule Runtimes support the Embedded Policy Enforcement on them.

>> The only option that cannot have or does not support embedded policy enforcement and must have API Proxy is for Non-Mule Applications.

So, Non-Mule application is the right answer.


by Mitzie at Sep 18, 2024, 06:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Vallie
18 days ago
Haha, good one Verda! This question is making my head spin. Maybe we should just ask the API to tell us the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
19 days ago
I don't know, guys. Isn't this just a fancy way of saying 'Use the force, Luke'? I'm going to need more technical details to make a decision here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
21 days ago
I'm gonna go with B. Modifying a Mule 3 or 4 app with custom Java code gives you more flexibility to handle the policy enforcement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 months ago
I agree with Brynn. C seems like the most straightforward way to handle this use case. Mule 4 applications with API specs are designed for this kind of thing.
upvoted 0 times
Tracey
5 days ago
B: That makes sense, using an API spec would definitely help enforce the Client ID policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 days ago
C: A Mule 4 application with an API specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
13 days ago
B: A Mule 3 or Mule 4 application modified with custom Java code
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think embedding the policy directly in the application's JVM could lead to more complex and harder to maintain code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
2 months ago
I agree with Alline. Enforcing the Client ID policy in the API proxy makes sense for better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) A Mule 4 application with an API specification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a Non-Mule application (D) be a better choice to avoid embedding the policy directly in the application's JVM?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. Using a Mule 4 application with an API specification makes the most sense to enforce the Client ID Enforcement policy.
upvoted 0 times
Kip
30 days ago
D) A Non-Mule application
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
1 months ago
C) A Mule 4 application with an API specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 months ago
B) A Mule 3 or Mule 4 application modified with custom Java code
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 months ago
A) A Mule 3 application using APIkit
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel