BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Platform Architect I Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions]

A company has started to create an application network and is now planning to implement a Center for Enablement (C4E) organizational model. What key factor would lead the company to decide upon a federated rather than a centralized C4E?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Correct Answer : When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups

*****************************************

>> It would require lot of process effort in an organization to have a single C4E team coordinating with multiple already organized development teams which are into several independent initiatives. A single C4E works well with different teams having at least a common initiative. So, in this scenario, federated C4E works well instead of centralized C4E.


by Carole at Sep 18, 2024, 12:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Georgene
21 days ago
Hold up, did someone say 'cloud-based applications'? That's the real key factor here! Option D is the way to go, trust me, I'm a certified cloud-whisperer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
22 days ago
Haha, I bet the developers are already debating which pizza toppings to include in the 'API Integration Training' sessions. Option B sounds like a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
24 days ago
Hmm, interesting. I was leaning towards option A, as sharing common assets across teams is a key driver for a federated approach. But I can see the logic in C as well.
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
5 days ago
True, it really depends on the specific situation and needs of the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
8 days ago
I agree, but option C could also be a good choice if the development is already organized into independent groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
9 days ago
Option A makes sense, especially if there are a lot of common assets to share.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roosevelt
29 days ago
I think option C is the correct answer. When the company has several independent development initiatives, a federated C4E model would be more appropriate to cater to their diverse needs.
upvoted 0 times
Dona
4 days ago
B: Yeah, a centralized model might not be able to support the diverse needs of different development groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
21 days ago
A: I agree, having several independent development initiatives would require a federated C4E model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johna
1 months ago
But what about the option of having a centralized C4E when there are a large number of existing common assets shared by development teams? Wouldn't that also be a valid reason?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Donte. Having separate teams working on different initiatives would benefit more from a federated model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
2 months ago
I think the key factor for deciding on a federated C4E is when development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel