Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

What is the MuleSoft-recommended best practice to share the connector and configuration information among the APIs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Pansy at Jan 14, 2025, 09:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Willard
17 days ago
But wouldn't creating an API proxy for each System API be easier to manage in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
18 days ago
I disagree, I believe building separate Mule domain projects for each API is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
24 days ago
Haha, option C is like creating a whole new API just to access the database. Seems like a lot of work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Xuan
8 days ago
A) Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
25 days ago
I think the best practice is to build a Mule domain project and reference it from each System API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
28 days ago
Option D with the API proxy sounds interesting, but might be overkill for this use case. I'd lean towards A or B.
upvoted 0 times
Brock
5 days ago
Option D with the API proxy does seem like it could be too complex for this scenario. A or B would be more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
6 days ago
I agree, option B could also work well by using a shared file store for the configuration information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
13 days ago
I think option A makes sense, it's a simple and efficient way to share the connector and configuration information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
1 months ago
I like the idea of a shared domain project in option A. Seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
1 months ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. Keep it simple and reusable across multiple APIs.
upvoted 0 times
Myra
5 days ago
User 4: Let's go with option A then, keep it simple and reusable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 days ago
User 3: It definitely makes sense to have a centralized configuration for all APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
12 days ago
User 2: I agree, building a Mule domain project seems like the most efficient way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
22 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel