Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 2
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

The retrieveBalances flow in the Mule application is designed to use an operation in a connector to the Finance system (the Finance operation) that

can only look up one account record at a time, and a operation from a different connector to the Audit system (the Audit operation) that can only

insert one account record at a time.

To best meet the performance-related requirements, what scope or scopes should be used and how should they be used to incorporate the Finance

operation and Audit operation into the retrieveBalances flow?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sabra
2 months ago
Ooh, someone's trying to trick us with these options! I'm going to go with B, it's the only one that really addresses the performance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Alishia
30 days ago
Yeah, B is the way to go for sure. It's the only one that really makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical option to incorporate both operations efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
1 months ago
I think B is the best choice too. It handles the performance requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dewitt
2 months ago
Haha, this question is like a game of 'Choose Your Own Adventure' for Mule developers. I'm going with B - it's the most robust and reliable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 months ago
D is the way to go! Using a For-Each scope will let us process multiple account records at once, reducing the number of individual calls to the Finance and Audit systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
C seems like the best option to me. Wrapping both operations in an Async scope will allow them to run concurrently, improving the overall performance of the flow.
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
18 days ago
Yes, Async scope is the way to go for this scenario. It will help optimize the flow performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
20 days ago
Async scope definitely seems like the right choice here. It will speed up the process by running the operations concurrently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
22 days ago
I agree, using Async scope for both operations is the way to go for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
24 days ago
C seems like the best option to me. Wrapping both operations in an Async scope will allow them to run concurrently, improving the overall performance of the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. The Until-Successful scope will ensure the Finance operation is retried until it succeeds, while the Try-Catch scope will handle any errors that may occur in the Audit operation.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
1 months ago
The Try-Catch scope will handle any errors that may occur in the Audit operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 months ago
The Until-Successful scope will ensure the Finance operation is retried until it succeeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
The Until-Successful scope will ensure the Finance operation is retried until it succeeds, while the Try-Catch scope will handle any errors that may occur in the Audit operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it ensures the Finance operation is retried until successful before moving on to the Audit operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for parallel processing of the Finance and Audit operations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel