Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 10 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 10
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

A retail company is implementing a MuleSoft API to get inventory details from two vendors by Invoking each vendor's online applications. Due to network issues, the invocations to the vendor applications are timing out intermittently, but the requests are successful after re-invoking each

What is the most performant way of implementing the API to invoke each vendor application and to retry invocations that generate timeout errors?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Yaeko at May 23, 2024, 11:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Merri
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the vendors are using the same internet provider as my grandma. Her Wi-Fi cuts out every time she tries to stream her cat videos!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Option D with the Round-Robin scope and Try-Catch scope in each route might be a good alternative. It could help balance the load between the two vendor applications and still handle the timeout errors.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
9 months ago
I agree, using a Scatter-Gather scope with an Until-Successful scope in each route could help with handling timeout errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
9 months ago
I think using a For-Each scope inside an Until-Successful scope might be more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
9 months ago
Using a Scatter-Gather scope with an Until-Successful scope in each route might be a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
9 months ago
Option D with the Round-Robin scope and Try-Catch scope could be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
10 months ago
I think using a For-Each scope inside an Until-Successful scope could also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
10 months ago
Option D with Round-Robin scope and Try-Catch scope sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
10 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option C with the Scatter-Gather scope might be a better choice. That way, we can invoke both vendor applications in parallel and use an Until-Successful scope on each route to handle the timeout errors.
upvoted 0 times
Mose
9 months ago
I agree, that way we can ensure that the requests are retried if they encounter any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
10 months ago
Yes, and using an Until-Successful scope on each route will help us handle any timeout errors that may occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
10 months ago
Option C with the Scatter-Gather scope sounds like a good idea. It allows us to invoke both vendor applications in parallel.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
11 months ago
I agree with Carmen. Option B seems like the most efficient way to handle this situation. The Choice scope will allow us to invoke each vendor application simultaneously, and the Until-Successful scope will ensure that we retry any requests that time out.
upvoted 0 times
Dawne
9 months ago
I agree, using a Choice scope for separate routes and an Until-Successful scope for retries seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
9 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. It allows us to invoke each vendor application separately and retry any timeouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
10 months ago
I agree, using a Choice scope for simultaneous invocations and an Until-Successful scope for retries seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
10 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice. It allows us to invoke both vendors separately and retry any timeouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
11 months ago
I think option B is the most performant. Using a Choice scope to invoke each vendor application on a separate route, and then placing the Choice scope inside an Until-Successful scope to retry requests that raise timeout errors, seems like the best approach to handle the intermittent network issues.
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
10 months ago
I think option B is the way to go as well. It provides a good balance between invoking the vendors and handling timeout errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient way to handle the network timeouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel