Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Intelligence Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 3

[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions]

An implementation engineer has been asked to perform QA for a standard file ingestion, done by the client.

The source file that was ingested can be seen below:

The number of rows added to this data stream is 3. What could have led to this discrepancy?

AAll fields are mapped except for the Media Buy Key.

BAll fields are mapped except for the Creative Name

CAll fields are mapped except for the Media Buy Name.

DAll fields are mapped except for the Campaign Key

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Yuki at Aug 27, 2024, 06:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Noel

2 months ago

I think the real issue here is that the engineer forgot to use the 'Magic Ingestion Spell' before running the QA. Rookie mistake!

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

2 months ago

I bet the engineer was having a bad day and just forgot to map the Campaign Key. Happens to the best of us, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Val

1 months ago

Alaine: Definitely, small mistakes can lead to big issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

1 months ago

It's important to double-check all the mappings before ingestion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

2 months ago

Yeah, that could be the reason for the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

2 months ago

Maybe the Campaign Key was not mapped correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

2 months ago

Wait, are we sure the file wasn't just written in invisible ink? That would explain the row count discrepancy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

2 months ago

C'mon, it's the Media Buy Name that's missing. This is too easy, I could do QA in my sleep!

upvoted 0 times

Barbra

2 months ago

I agree, it's a pretty straightforward QA task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

2 months ago

Yeah, that seems like the most likely reason for the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

2 months ago

I think it's the Media Buy Name that's missing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

3 months ago

I think the Creative Name could also be a factor for the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

3 months ago

I believe it could also be because of missing mapping for the Campaign Key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Grover

3 months ago

I agree with Selma, missing mapping for the Media Buy Key seems like a possible reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

3 months ago

I think the discrepancy could be due to missing mapping for the Media Buy Key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlene

3 months ago

Yikes, looks like they forgot to map the Creative Name. I hope the client doesn't notice this little oversight!

upvoted 0 times

Delisa

3 months ago

Hopefully the client doesn't catch that mistake.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

3 months ago

Yes, that could be the reason why only 3 rows were added.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

3 months ago

Did you notice that the Creative Name field was not mapped?

upvoted 0 times

...

Barb

4 months ago

The issue is clearly with the Media Buy Key field not being mapped. The row count discrepancy is a dead giveaway.

upvoted 0 times

Elfriede

3 months ago

Paulene: Exactly, that's what led to the discrepancy in the number of rows added.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

3 months ago

So, the correct answer is A) All fields are mapped except for the Media Buy Key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

3 months ago

That makes sense, the row count discrepancy is a dead giveaway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

3 months ago

The issue is clearly with the Media Buy Key field not being mapped.

upvoted 0 times

...