BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Intelligence Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions]

An Implementation engineer is requested to create a new harmonization field 'Offer' and apply the following logic:

The implementation engineer to use the Harmonization Center. Which of the below actions can help implement the new dimension 'Offer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Samira
24 days ago
Ah, the joys of harmonizing fields! Option B is the way to go - clean, concise, and gets the job done. Unless, of course, you're feeling adventurous and want to create a new custom attribute called 'Offer-Matic 3000'.
upvoted 0 times
Isidra
11 days ago
Option B is definitely the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
1 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Both options A and B seem plausible for implementing the new dimension 'Offer'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
1 months ago
Hmm, option D seems a bit convoluted with the 'Web Analytics Site Source' extraction. I think option B is the cleanest solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Nettie
6 days ago
Yeah, option B seems like the most efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
12 days ago
Option B does make sense, keeping it simple with just 3 patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
26 days ago
I think option B is the best way to go as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
1 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the 'Web Analytics Site custom attribute' mentioned in option A. Wouldn't it be better to use a Campaign custom attribute as suggested in option B? That seems more in line with the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
16 days ago
Yeah, option B with the Campaign custom attribute aligns better with the requirement. It's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
17 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most appropriate solution for implementing the new dimension 'Offer'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Using a Campaign custom attribute makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the right choice as it mentions creating a formula within a Campaign custom attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct one because it mentions creating a formula within a Web Analytics Site custom attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Option B looks the most straightforward. Creating two patterns for the LinkedIn and AdRoll sources, and then a third pattern for the Campaign custom attribute in Google Analytics seems like the simplest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
13 days ago
Yes, it's a clear and organized way to implement the new dimension 'Offer'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
16 days ago
I think having a separate pattern for the Campaign custom attribute makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 months ago
It definitely simplifies the process by breaking it down into three patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
1 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel