Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Intelligence Topic 11 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Intelligence exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 11
[All Marketing Cloud Intelligence Questions]

Source 3:

Via the harmonization Center, the Client has created Patterns and applied a classification rule using source 2.

While performing QA, you have spotted that the final value of clicks for Product Group Ais 10, where it should've been i5.

How can an implementation engineer fix this discrepancy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Case Sensitivity Issue:

The discrepancy in the 'Clicks' value for Product Group A (10 instead of 15) likely arises from a mismatch caused by case sensitivity in the classification rules. If some data entries use different capitalization (e.g., 'Product Group A' vs. 'product group a'), the system might treat them as distinct entries, leading to incorrect aggregations.

Solution:

By unchecking the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox, the harmonization process will treat entries with different capitalization as the same value. This ensures consistent classification and resolves discrepancies in aggregated metrics like 'Clicks.'


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ngoc
1 months ago
Hold up, why are we even considering toggling 'Structure Compliant' off? That's just madness. A is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 months ago
Option A all the way! Forget about that 'Structure Compliant' nonsense, just uncheck the 'Case Sensitive' box and you're good to go.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
29 days ago
Yeah, I think unchecking the 'Case Sensitive' box is the best solution here. Let's go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 months ago
I agree, option A is the way to go. Just uncheck the 'Case Sensitive' box and it should fix the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
2 months ago
This one's tricky, but I think option A is the way to go. Gotta love those case-sensitive issues!
upvoted 0 times
Nancey
13 days ago
Yeah, option A makes the most sense to me too. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
18 days ago
I'm leaning towards option A as well, case sensitivity can definitely cause discrepancies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
30 days ago
I think option D could also work, by uploading both sources to the same data stream type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the best solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiera
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with option A. Unchecking the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
1 months ago
I think unchecking the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
2 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the best solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karma
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Toggle the 'Structure Compliant' OFF might also be a possible solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Upload both source 1 and 3 to the same data stream type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Uncheck the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
The 'Case Sensitive' checkbox is the answer here. I'm pretty sure that's the issue causing the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
Carlee
2 months ago
B) Leave the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox in the data classification unchecked
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 months ago
That makes sense, it should fix the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
A) Uncheck the 'Case Sensitive' checkbox in the data classification
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel