Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Email Specialist Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Email Specialist exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 3
[All Marketing Cloud Email Specialist Questions]

When building an email audience, a marketer first runs a query to update a data extension referenced in the audience query.

Which configuration should be used to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lonna at Sep 15, 2024, 12:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Email Specialist Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Erick
4 months ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs. Anything else would be like trying to herd cats with a pool noodle.
upvoted 0 times
Marya
3 months ago
Definitely, it's all about setting up the right order for things to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
I agree, having the audience query run after the exclusion query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
3 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have the exclusion updated first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
3 months ago
I'm gonna go with B) on this one. It's the most logical setup to ensure the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
4 months ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense. B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
3 months ago
I agree, placing the audience SQL Query Activity after the exclusion SQL Query Activity makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
3 months ago
B) is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
3 months ago
A wait step? Really? That's like trying to microwave a penguin - it just doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
4 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B provides a clearer sequence of steps in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it directly places the audience SQL Query Activity below the exclusion SQL Query Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C), but B) makes more sense. Gotta love these tricky email marketing questions!
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
4 months ago
Definitely, B) is the most logical configuration to ensure the exclusion is updated before running the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I was also considering C), but now I see why B) is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. B) seems like the best option for updating the exclusion before the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
4 months ago
I think B) is the way to go. It just makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
5 months ago
I think option B is the best choice because it ensures the exclusion is updated before the audience query runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
I think B) is the correct answer. The audience query should run after the exclusion query to ensure the updated data is used.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
4 months ago
Exactly, it's important to have the correct order for the queries to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
4 months ago
That makes sense. It ensures the updated data is used in the audience query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
4 months ago
Yes, you're right. The audience query should run after the exclusion query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
5 months ago
I think B) is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel