Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Integration-Architect Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Integration Architect exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) currently owns a middleware tool and they have developed an API-led integration architecture with three API tiers. The first tier interfaces directly with the systems of engagement, the second tier implements business logic and aggregates data, while the third tier interfaces directly with systems of record. Some of the systems of engagement will be a mobile application, a web application, and Salesforce.

UC has a business requirement to return data to the systems of engagement in different formats while also enforcing different security protocols.

What should an Integration Architect recommend to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Werner at Jul 05, 2024, 06:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Integration-Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Pearlie
23 days ago
Option A is just asking for trouble. Trying to manage all that at the first tier? No way, that's a recipe for a maintenance nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
5 days ago
User 3: Option B sounds like the best solution to enforce security protocols and return formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
7 days ago
User 2: I agree, it would be much better to implement an API gateway for all systems to interface with first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
8 days ago
User 1: Option A is definitely not the way to go. It would be too complicated to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
13 days ago
User 1: Option A is definitely not the way to go. It would be too complicated to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shoshana
25 days ago
I prefer option D because it provides a more secure solution with SAML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
28 days ago
I think option C could also work, depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers are hoping the right answer isn't Option D. Who wants to deal with SAML, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Enforcing the security and formatting at the second tier seems more efficient than trying to handle it all at the first tier.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
21 days ago
User 3: Yeah, it seems like a good balance between security and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
24 days ago
User 2: I agree. It would be more efficient to enforce those requirements at the second tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
25 days ago
User 1: I think Option C is the way to go. It makes sense to handle security and formatting at the second tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tien
1 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Implementing an API gateway to handle the different security protocols and return formats makes a lot of sense. It keeps the complexity out of the individual API tiers.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
20 days ago
User 2: I agree. It centralizes the management of security and formats, making it easier to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
25 days ago
User 1: Option B sounds like the way to go. Implementing an API gateway to handle the different security protocols and return formats makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bo
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel