Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Identity and Access Management Architect exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Identity and Access Management Architect Questions]

Universal Containers wants to secure its Salesforce APIs by using an existing Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) configuration supports the company's single sign-on process to Salesforce,

Which Salesforce OAuth authorization flow should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ashlee
2 months ago
I love a good SAML and OAuth challenge! Option A is the clear winner here. Now, if only I could figure out how to integrate them using a unicorn and some glitter...
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
1 months ago
Let's keep it simple and go with option A for the Salesforce OAuth authorization flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
1 months ago
Using a unicorn and glitter might make the integration more fun, but sticking to the OAuth 2.0 SAML Bearer Assertion Flow is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 months ago
It's definitely a challenge, but using the right flow can make all the difference in securing the APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
2 months ago
I agree, Option A is the best choice for integrating SAML and OAuth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
2 months ago
Option A) OAuth 2.0 SAML Bearer Assertion Flow is the way to go for securing Salesforce APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
2 months ago
I agree, option A is the best choice for securing Salesforce APIs with SAML.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Broderick
3 months ago
Hmm, this question is a bit of a head-scratcher. I'm going to go with option A, but I'm not 100% confident in my choice. Maybe I should have studied more SAML and OAuth integrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
3 months ago
Option A all the way! It's the only one that specifically mentions SAML, which is the key requirement in this case. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
3 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. The question is a bit confusing, but I'd probably go with option A. SAML and OAuth integration can be tricky, so it's important to get it right.
upvoted 0 times
Chan
2 months ago
Let's go with option A then, it seems to be the most secure option for Universal Containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
2 months ago
I agree, SAML and OAuth integration can be tricky, but option A seems like the right fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for securing Salesforce APIs with SAML.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frankie
3 months ago
I agree with Gracie. Option A seems to be the best fit for the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
2 months ago
I agree, the OAuth 2.0 SAML Bearer Assertion Flow would work well for single sign-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for securing Salesforce APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
2 months ago
I agree, the OAuth 2.0 SAML Bearer Assertion Flow would work well for single sign-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for securing Salesforce APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
3 months ago
I think option A is the right choice here. The question clearly mentions using an existing SAML configuration, so the OAuth 2.0 SAML Bearer Assertion Flow seems like the most appropriate option.
upvoted 0 times
Larae
2 months ago
Yes, I think option A aligns well with the existing SAML configuration mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel