BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Financial Services Cloud Topic 4 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Financial Services Cloud exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 4
[All Financial Services Cloud Questions]

Cumulus Insurance has a franchise business model with a large number of franchisees who operate independently but report to regional managers who are Cumulus employees. The company would like the franchise owners and their employees to have access to the Cumulus Salesforce Financial Services Cloud (FSC) instance. The company plans to use the Role Hierarchy and sharing rules to implement this. What should the architect at Cumulus Insurance be aware of for this solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The architect at Cumulus Insurance should be aware of the limitation that the administrator can define up to 300 total sharing rules for each object when using the Role Hierarchy and sharing rules to implement the franchise business model. Sharing rules are a way of granting additional access to records based on criteria, such as record owner, role, or field values. The Role Hierarchy is a way of organizing users into a hierarchy that reflects the reporting structure of the company. The Role Hierarchy and sharing rules can be used together to control the access and visibility of records for different users in Financial Services Cloud. However, there is a limit of 300 sharing rules per object, which means that the administrator may need to use other methods, such as public groups or manual sharing, to grant access to records beyond this limit.


[Sharing Rules]

[Role Hierarchy]

[Sharing Rule Limits]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carmen
18 days ago
Wow, 1,024 public groups? That's like, a whole lot of groups. I bet the Salesforce engineers were high when they came up with that number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
21 days ago
Multiple roles? Sign me up! That's the way to go. D all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
23 days ago
A? Switching browsers for Lightning Web Components? That's so 2010. Salesforce should be more platform-agnostic these days.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
4 days ago
C) The administrator can define up to 300 total sharing rules for each object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
6 days ago
B) Salesforce FSC only allows 1,024 public groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
7 days ago
A) Franchise users will need to switch their browsers to a platform that supports Lightning Web Components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
11 days ago
A) Franchise users will need to switch their browsers to a platform that supports Lightning Web Components.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
1 months ago
I'm going with C. The 300 sharing rule limit seems reasonable, and it allows the admin to have fine-grained control over access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
1 months ago
I believe the administrator can define up to 300 total sharing rules for each object, which is also crucial for this solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 months ago
B sounds a bit limiting, don't you think? Salesforce should really be able to handle more than 1,024 public groups for a large franchise network.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
1 days ago
Franchise users can have multiple roles in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
4 days ago
C) The administrator can define up to 300 total sharing rules for each object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
13 days ago
A) Franchise users will need to switch their browsers to a platform that supports Lightning Web Components.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
India
1 months ago
I agree with you, Carole. That's important to consider for setting up the Role Hierarchy and sharing rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure it's D. Franchise users can have multiple roles in the hierarchy. That seems like a logical solution for a franchise business model.
upvoted 0 times
Virgie
11 days ago
That makes sense, ensuring that franchise owners and employees have the necessary access while maintaining a structured hierarchy is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
15 days ago
I don't think so, I believe the focus should be on allowing franchise users to have flexibility in their roles within the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
17 days ago
But what about the limit on public groups in Salesforce FSC? Could that be a factor to consider?
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
19 days ago
I think you're right, franchise users having multiple roles in the hierarchy makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carole
2 months ago
I think the architect should be aware that franchise users can have multiple roles in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel