BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has been using Salesforce Sales Cloud for many years

following a highly customized, single-org strategy with great success so far.

What two reasons can justify a change to a multi-org strategy?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rikki
3 months ago
C is just ridiculous. Unifying processes across all business units in separate orgs? That's like trying to herd cats. A and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
3 months ago
I'm going with A and D. Having separate orgs for different business units makes sense, especially if they have their own regulatory requirements. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
Johnetta
3 months ago
Definitely. It's all about finding the right balance between customization and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
3 months ago
Using separate orgs can also help with security and compliance for each business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
3 months ago
I agree. It can be more efficient to have separate orgs for different processes and regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
3 months ago
A and D are good choices. It's important to keep things simple when dealing with different business units.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorian
4 months ago
Haha, can you imagine trying to use Chatter to collaborate across different business units that have nothing in common? That's like trying to get your grandparents to use social media.
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
2 months ago
B) UC wants to use Chatter for collaboration among different business units and stop working in silos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
3 months ago
True, it would be a challenge to get everyone on the same page with Chatter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
3 months ago
D) Acquired company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
3 months ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zachary
4 months ago
A and D seem like the most valid reasons to move to a multi-org strategy. Launching a new line of business with independent processes and acquiring a company with its own Salesforce org would definitely justify the change.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannetta
3 months ago
It would help streamline operations and collaboration across different business units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
3 months ago
Those are definitely valid reasons to consider a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
3 months ago
D) Acquired company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
4 months ago
I believe B could also be a valid reason. Collaboration among different business units is important for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
I agree with you, Malcolm. A new line of business and an acquired company with its own org are strong reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
I think A and D are good reasons for UC to switch to a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel