Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 6 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 6
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) innovative apps division is releasing an application that can

be installed in its trading partners Salesforce environments. The application lets the trading

partners book containers from UC directly without leaving their own Salesforce environment.

The partners can then build on top of the application with process builders and triggers so the

container booking process can be integrated with the trading partners' own processes.

What is the recommended mechanism for releasing the application considering the innovative

apps division wants to keep the application up to date in various environments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lai at Aug 05, 2024, 12:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sang
3 months ago
I think Unmanaged package could also work, as it allows more flexibility for the trading partners to customize the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
I prefer Change sets because they are easier to work with and deploy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
3 months ago
I agree with Dorothy, Managed package ensures the application can be kept up to date in various environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
I think the recommended mechanism is a Managed package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
3 months ago
I believe Managed package is the best option because it provides better control and versioning for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
Let's keep it simple with the managed package. I don't want the trading partners to get lost in a sea of change sets and zip files. They're already busy enough, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
2 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
D) Zip file deployable by SFDX or ANT
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
2 months ago
B) Unmanaged package
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
3 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonardo
3 months ago
Ooh, managed package, huh? Sounds like a way to keep those updates flowing without the partners having to do too much. Smooth sailing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
3 months ago
The zip file option might be a bit more technical, but it could give the partners more flexibility. Just don't forget to include the instructions on how to deploy it!
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
3 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
3 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
Hmm, managed package sounds like the way to go. Gotta keep those trading partners happy with the latest and greatest, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Pearly
2 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
2 months ago
Definitely! Managed package is the way to go for keeping the application up to date in various environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
D) Zip file deployable by SFDX or ANT
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
3 months ago
B) Unmanaged package
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
3 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ariel
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Unmanaged package could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
4 months ago
I'd go with the managed package option. Keeps everything nice and tidy, plus the partners can get updates seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
Aja
2 months ago
Managed package it is then. It's the best option for keeping everything organized and up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Definitely, managed package ensures that updates are seamless for the trading partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
3 months ago
I agree, managed package is the way to go. It's easier to maintain and update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
D) Zip file deployable by SFDX or ANT
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
3 months ago
C) Managed package
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
3 months ago
B) Unmanaged package
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
3 months ago
A) Change sets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evan
4 months ago
I agree with Malcom, Managed package ensures the application can be kept up to date in various environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
I think the recommended mechanism is a Managed package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
4 months ago
Managed package all the way! That way, the partners can get updates easily without any hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
4 months ago
True, with managed package, UC can ensure consistency across all trading partners' environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
4 months ago
Managed package is definitely more secure and controlled for updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
4 months ago
But what about unmanaged package? Wouldn't that give more flexibility to trading partners?
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
4 months ago
I agree, managed package is the way to go for easy updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel