Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 5 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 5
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has been using Salesforce Sales Cloud for many years

following a highly customized, single-org strategy with great success so far.

What two reasons can justify a change to a multi-org strategy?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Lettie at Aug 27, 2024, 07:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hermila
4 months ago
I'm with Melina and Oliva on this one. A and D make the most sense. And let's be real, if you have to ask 'what two reasons can justify a change,' the answer is probably 'your org is a mess and you need to fix it.'
upvoted 0 times
Rosann
3 months ago
I agree with you, A and D seem like the most logical reasons for a change to a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
3 months ago
D) Acquired company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
4 months ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julene
4 months ago
I see your point, Johna. Having acquired companies with different orgs can complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
4 months ago
I believe option D is also a valid reason for considering a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
Ha! 'Unification enterprise architecture'? Sounds like someone's been reading too many management books. C is a hard pass for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
4 months ago
B is a bit of a head-scratcher. Chatter isn't exactly cutting-edge these days, and 'stop working in silos' sounds more like a cheesy buzzword than a real reason to change your org structure.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
3 months ago
B is a bit of a head-scratcher. Chatter isn't exactly cutting-edge these days, and 'stop working in silos' sounds more like a cheesy buzzword than a real reason to change your org structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
3 months ago
D) Acquired company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
4 months ago
A) UC is launching a new line of business with independent processes and adding any new feature to it is too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
4 months ago
I agree with you, Francoise. Option A makes sense for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
4 months ago
I agree with Melina. A and D are the clear winners here. Keeping things separate and manageable is key, especially for a growing company like UC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
A and D, for sure. Having separate orgs for different business lines and acquisitions makes total sense to me. Trying to cram everything into one org sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
4 months ago
It definitely makes sense to have different orgs for acquisitions with their own set of requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
4 months ago
I agree, having separate orgs for different business lines can help keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
5 months ago
I think option A is a good reason for a multi-org strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel