Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 4
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers would like to conduct performance testing on its new major release. What three things should the architect consider when discussing performance testing?

Choose 3 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Mendy at Sep 17, 2024, 07:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rana
3 months ago
I agree with Giovanna, option C is the way to go. Sandbox testing is the safest approach for performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
2 months ago
Yes, sandbox testing can help prevent any negative impact on production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 months ago
It's important to consider the environment when conducting performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
I agree, running performance tests in a sandbox is definitely safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
3 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
3 months ago
E) Performance tests may be run without advanced notice, but Salesforce will not store performance logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
3 months ago
C) Performance tests must be run in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
3 months ago
A) Salesforce must be informed at least 7 days before starting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammy
4 months ago
Haha, option E is a bit of a joke, right? Salesforce not storing performance logs? Come on, they're not that careless.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
3 months ago
User 3: Definitely, they wouldn't just skip storing performance logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
3 months ago
I agree, Salesforce is pretty thorough with their logging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
3 months ago
Yeah, option E does seem a bit unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
4 months ago
I believe performance tests should be run in a sandbox to accurately reflect real-world conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
4 months ago
I agree with that. It's important to have Salesforce monitor the test activity to ensure no issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
Option D is a good one. Providing a business justification is a smart move before running performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
3 months ago
Yolande: Absolutely. It's important to have a justification for the resources being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
3 months ago
User 3: Option D is a must. It shows that the tests are being done for a valid reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
3 months ago
User 2: I agree. It helps to have a clear purpose before conducting any tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
3 months ago
Option D is definitely important. It's good to have a solid reason for running performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option A. Informing Salesforce 7 days in advance seems a bit excessive.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
3 months ago
But do you think 7 days in advance is too much? Maybe a shorter notice would suffice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
4 months ago
I agree, it's better to give them a heads up so they can monitor the test activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
4 months ago
Option A may be necessary to ensure Salesforce is prepared for the performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
4 months ago
I think the architect should consider informing Salesforce before starting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
4 months ago
Option B sounds reasonable, as Salesforce should monitor the tests to ensure there are no issues with their services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
4 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Running performance tests in a sandbox is important to ensure the production environment is not impacted.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
3 months ago
I agree with both of you. Option C seems to be the most logical choice for conducting performance tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
3 months ago
Yes, it's definitely a best practice to conduct performance testing in a controlled environment like a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
I think option C is a good choice too. It's important to consider the potential impact on the live system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
4 months ago
I agree, running performance tests in a sandbox is crucial to avoid impacting the production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel