Salesforce Exam Data Cloud Consultant Topic 6 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Cloud Consultant exam

Question #: 29
Topic #: 6

A Data Cloud consultant tries to save a new 1-to-l relationship between the Account DMO and Contact Point Address DMO but gets an error.

What should the consultant do to fix this error?

AMap additional fields to the Contact Point Address DMO.

BMake sure that the total account records are high enough for Identity resolution.

CChange the cardinality to many-to-one to accommodate multiple contacts per account.

DMap Account to Contact Point Email and Contact Point Phone also.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Relationship Cardinality: In Salesforce Data Cloud, defining the correct relationship cardinality between data model objects (DMOs) is crucial for accurate data representation and integration.

1-to-1 Relationship Error: The error occurs because the relationship between Account DMO and Contact Point Address DMO is set as 1-to-1, which implies that each account can only have one contact point address.

Solution:

Change Cardinality: Modify the relationship cardinality to many-to-one. This allows multiple contact point addresses to be associated with a single account, reflecting real-world scenarios more accurately.

Steps:

Go to the data model configuration in Data Cloud.

Locate the relationship between Account DMO and Contact Point Address DMO.

Change the relationship type from 1-to-1 to many-to-one.

Benefits:

Accurate Representation: Accommodates real-world data scenarios where an account may have multiple contact points.

Error Resolution: Resolves the error and ensures smooth data integration.

Salesforce Data Cloud Documentation: Relationships

Salesforce Help: Data Modeling in Data Cloud

by Alyce at Oct 20, 2024, 08:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Data Cloud Consultant Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Karon

3 months ago

I don't know, maybe the consultant could try turning it off and back on again? Or calling the IT guy in the cloud? C is probably the safest bet, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

3 months ago

Wait, so the consultant is trying to save a relationship but gets an error? Sounds like a dating app gone wrong. I'd suggest C, or maybe just delete the app and start over.

upvoted 0 times

Leah

2 months ago

D: Or maybe making sure that the total account records are high enough for Identity resolution could fix the error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

3 months ago

C: Yeah, mapping Account to Contact Point Email and Contact Point Phone could also be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

3 months ago

B: Maybe changing the cardinality to many-to-one would help accommodate multiple contacts per account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Son

3 months ago

A: I think the consultant should try mapping additional fields to the Contact Point Address DMO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliseo

4 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Seems like the only option that actually addresses the 1-to-1 relationship error.

upvoted 0 times

Emelda

3 months ago

Agreed, changing the cardinality seems like the right solution here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

3 months ago

That makes sense, it should solve the 1-to-1 relationship error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

3 months ago

C) Change the cardinality to many-to-one to accommodate multiple contacts per account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Omega

4 months ago

B? Really? Increasing the account records won't fix a problem with the relationship itself. C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

4 months ago

I agree with Edna. Mapping additional fields might help fix the error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

4 months ago

D sounds interesting, but mapping to Email and Phone doesn't really solve the 1-to-1 relationship issue. I'd go with C.

upvoted 0 times

Ashton

3 months ago

Let's go ahead and make that change then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

3 months ago

That should definitely help fix the error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melda

3 months ago

Agreed, changing the cardinality to many-to-one makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

4 months ago

I think C is the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

4 months ago

I think the answer is C. Changing the cardinality to many-to-one seems like the logical solution to accommodate multiple contacts per account.

upvoted 0 times

Francoise

3 months ago

Yes, mapping those fields could provide a more comprehensive view of the relationship between the entities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

4 months ago

Should the consultant also map Account to Contact Point Email and Contact Point Phone?

upvoted 0 times

...

Osvaldo

4 months ago

That makes sense. It would allow for more flexibility in the relationship between Account DMO and Contact Point Address DMO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Na

4 months ago

I think the answer is C. Changing the cardinality to many-to-one seems like the logical solution to accommodate multiple contacts per account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

4 months ago

I think the consultant should map additional fields to the Contact Point Address DMO.

upvoted 0 times

...