Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Data Cloud Consultant Topic 6 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Cloud Consultant exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 6
[All Data Cloud Consultant Questions]

A consultant is helping a beauty company ingest its profile data into Data Cloud. The company's source data includes several fields, such as eye color, skin type, and hair color, that are not fields in the standard Individual data model object (DMO).

What should the consultant recommend to map this data to be used for both segmentation and identity resolution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best option to map the data to be used for both segmentation and identity resolution is to create custom fields on the standard Individual DMO.This way, the consultant can leverage the existing fields and functionality of the Individual DMO, such as identity resolution rulesets, calculated insights, and data actions, while adding the additional fields that are specific to the beauty company's data1. Creating a custom DMO from scratch or duplicating the standard Individual DMO would require more effort and maintenance, and might not be compatible with the existing features of Data Cloud. Creating a custom DMO with only the additional fields and mapping it to the standard Individual DMO would create unnecessary complexity and redundancy, and might not allow the use of the custom fields for identity resolution.Reference:

1:Data Model Objects in Data Cloud


by Ressie at Apr 14, 2024, 05:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Data Cloud Consultant Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lashon
6 months ago
That's a good point, it could be a good alternative option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
6 months ago
I think duplicating the standard Individual DMO and adding the additional fields could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
6 months ago
That's true, but it might require more effort and resources to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
Option C might work, but it could get messy if there are a lot of additional fields. Better to keep them separate in a custom DMO like Salina suggested.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
5 months ago
A: Option C might work, but it could get messy with a lot of additional fields. Keeping them separate seems like a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
5 months ago
B: I agree, that way we can keep the standard Individual DMO clean and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
5 months ago
A: I think creating a custom DMO with only the additional fields and mapping it to the standard Individual DMO would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reiko
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the beauty company has some really interesting data fields, like 'Glitter Level' and 'Sparkle Intensity'. Option B is the sensible choice, though.
upvoted 0 times
Lourdes
5 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best way to map those unique data fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
Haha, 'Glitter Level' and 'Sparkle Intensity' sound fun!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
5 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best way to map those unique data fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
Haha, 'Glitter Level' and 'Sparkle Intensity' sound fun!
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
Custom DMO with only the additional fields is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
6 months ago
Option B is the way to go, it makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
6 months ago
I agree, 'Glitter Level' and 'Sparkle Intensity' sound fun!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
6 months ago
But wouldn't creating a custom DMO from scratch be more flexible in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
7 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach here. Creating a custom DMO with just the additional fields and mapping it to the standard Individual DMO keeps things organized and maintains the integrity of the standard model.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
5 months ago
Agreed, it will help with segmentation and identity resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
5 months ago
It's important to keep things organized when mapping data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
5 months ago
Definitely a good way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
6 months ago
It maintains the integrity of the standard model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 months ago
Creating a custom DMO with just the additional fields makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
6 months ago
I agree, it keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
6 months ago
Agreed, creating a custom DMO with just the additional fields and mapping it to the standard Individual DMO seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It keeps things organized and maintains the integrity of the standard model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
7 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
7 months ago
I agree with Salina. Option B is the way to go. It's important to keep the core data model intact while still accommodating the specific needs of this beauty company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
7 months ago
I agree, it would make the data mapping process more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
7 months ago
I feel like the best option would be to create custom fields on the standard Individual DMO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
8 months ago
I'm feeling a bit like a beauty company consultant myself right now, trying to figure out the best way to handle this data. But I have to say, I'm leaning towards the custom DMO approach as well. It just seems like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
8 months ago
I'm with Dulce and Becky on this one. The custom DMO solution seems like the most robust and future-proof option. Plus, it gives us more flexibility to expand the data model as the client's needs evolve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that, Serina. Creating custom fields on the standard Individual DMO could potentially cause conflicts or issues with future updates to the standard object. I think the custom DMO approach is the safest bet, even if it requires a bit more work upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
8 months ago
I'm not sure I agree. Creating a custom DMO from scratch seems like overkill, and duplicating the standard Individual DMO and adding fields could lead to maintenance issues down the line. I think the best option is to create custom fields on the standard Individual DMO.
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
6 months ago
It could work, but adding custom fields to the standard DMO might be easier to manage in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
7 months ago
But wouldn't creating a custom DMO with only the additional fields also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
7 months ago
I agree, it will keep things simple and avoid maintenance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
7 months ago
I think creating custom fields on the standard Individual DMO is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Becky
8 months ago
I agree with Dulce. Creating a custom DMO with the additional fields is the most flexible approach. It allows us to maintain the standard Individual DMO while still accommodating the client's specific data requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
8 months ago
This question is testing our understanding of Salesforce's data model and how to extend it to fit the client's needs. I think the best approach would be to create a custom DMO with only the additional fields and map it to the standard Individual DMO. That way, we can keep the standard DMO intact and still add the necessary fields for segmentation and identity resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel