Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 7 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Based on government regulations, a Salesforce customer plans to implement the following in Salesforce for compliance:

Access to customer information based on record ownership

Ability for customers to request removal of their information from Salesforce

Prevent users from accessing Salesforce from outside company network (virtual private network, or VPN)

What should a data architect recommend to address these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kati at Apr 25, 2023, 07:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Esteban
6 months ago
B is interesting, but is it really necessary to host a custom app?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
6 months ago
Wait, can customers really request removal? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
6 months ago
A is too vague, we need a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
6 months ago
I disagree, D might offer better security features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
6 months ago
C seems like the best option for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the custom web application option. Does that really ensure compliance with the VPN requirement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
7 months ago
I feel like option D might be overkill for just compliance, but I can't recall the specifics about Salesforce Shield.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
7 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question about data access, and I leaned towards option C because it seems to cover all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
7 months ago
I remember we discussed IP restrictions in class, but I'm not entirely sure how they work with record ownership.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
7 months ago
The cache manifest sounds like it's all about enabling offline use of mobile apps, so I'll go with options A and C. Caching static resources makes sense, but I'm not sure about the rules part in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
7 months ago
The best approach here is to work closely with the business analysts to ensure the new feature is properly testable. That way, we can update the test suite accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
7 months ago
Okay, this looks straightforward. I'll need to update the yum repo config file and set the baseurl and gpgkey to the provided locations. Then I'll run a few commands to clean the cache and verify the repos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to make sure you configure the VLAN, Config-Sync IP, and Failover type first, then establish the device trust and sync, and finally create the device group. Gotta nail that order!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure I need to look at the Late Input Events and Out of Order Events metrics to get a full picture of the job's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
11 months ago
I bet Option B involves a lot of coding and headaches. Ain't nobody got time for that! Just give me the out-of-the-box Salesforce solution any day.
upvoted 0 times
Roy
10 months ago
I think Option D could also work well. Salesforce Shield with Event Monitoring seems like a solid choice for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
10 months ago
Yeah, I'd rather go with a solution that's already built into Salesforce. Option C seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
11 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most straightforward approach. No need to reinvent the wheel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
11 months ago
Option C sounds like the best solution to me. It covers all the requirements without too much hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
12 months ago
Option D with Salesforce Shield sounds interesting, but I wonder if it's overkill for these basic needs. Gotta keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Felix
10 months ago
Definitely, simplicity is important when it comes to compliance. Option C covers all the basic needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
10 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple is key. Option C seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
10 months ago
C) Implement IP restrictions, sharing settings, and custom Apex to support customer requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
1 year ago
Haha, Option A reminds me of that classic tech support line: 'Have you tried turning it off and on again?' Not very helpful for these requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
10 months ago
Definitely, we need to ensure customer information is protected and accessible only to the right people.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
10 months ago
Yeah, implementing IP restrictions and custom Apex code would provide the necessary security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
10 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best choice to address all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
10 months ago
Option A sounds like a quick fix, but I think we need a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
10 months ago
Definitely, Salesforce Shield with Event Monitoring could also help ensure compliance with government regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
11 months ago
Yeah, implementing IP restrictions and custom Apex code would provide better control over access and data removal requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
11 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a more comprehensive solution to meet the compliance needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
11 months ago
Option A sounds like a quick fix, but it may not fully address the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
Hmm, Option B might work, but I'm not sure if a custom web app is the best approach. Wouldn't it be more straightforward to use Salesforce's built-in features?
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
12 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most efficient way to address the compliance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
12 months ago
Option C sounds like a good solution. It covers all the requirements and uses Salesforce's existing features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yun
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option D could also be a good choice with Salesforce shield for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 year ago
Option C seems like the most comprehensive solution. I like how it covers both the access control and customer request requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Lisbeth
11 months ago
Yes, Salesforce shield with Event Monitoring could also be a good option to address these compliance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
12 months ago
It's important to ensure that customer information is protected and that users can easily request removal of their data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
12 months ago
I agree, implementing IP restrictions and custom Apex code would definitely help in meeting those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
12 months ago
Option C seems like the most comprehensive solution. I like how it covers both the access control and customer request requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delpha
1 year ago
I agree with Fannie. Option C seems like the most comprehensive solution for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice. It covers all the requirements mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel