Salesforce Exam CRT-403 Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 5

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) is looking to hire some new employees. UMS wants to allow the same applicant to apply for multiple open positions using a single application.

What should an app builder recommend to meet these requirements?

ACreate a master-detail relationship on Open_Position__c to Application__c

BCreate a master-detail relationship held on Applicant__c to Application__c

CCreate a master-detailrelationship field on Application__c to Open.Position__c

DCreate a master-detail relationship field on Applicant__c to Apphcabon_c

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

Create a master-detail relationship field on Applicant__c to Application__c is what the app builder should recommend to meet the requirements of allowing the same applicant to apply for multiple open positions using a single application. This will create a many-to-many relationship between Applicant__c and Open_Position__c using Application__c as a junction object. Create a master-detail relationship on Open_Position__c to Application__c, create a master-detail relationship field on Application__c to Open_Position__c, and create a lookup relationship field on Applicant__c to Application__c are not valid or correct ways to create a many-to-many relationship.

by Josphine at Apr 20, 2024, 01:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kattie

8 months ago

Hey, as long as they don't make me fill out a separate application for each open position, I'm happy. Who has time for that?

upvoted 0 times

Arthur

7 months ago

B) Create a master-detail relationship held on Applicant__c to Application__c

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

8 months ago

A) Create a master-detail relationship on Open_Position__c to Application__c

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

8 months ago

I'm going with C. A master-detail relationship on the application itself seems like the best way to connect the positions.

upvoted 0 times

Eleonora

8 months ago

I agree with you, C seems like the most logical choice. Connecting the application to the open positions makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

8 months ago

I disagree, I believe B is the way to go. It links the applicant directly to the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

8 months ago

I think A is the best option. It connects the open positions to the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

9 months ago

D is the answer, no doubt about it. Tying the applicant directly to the application is the cleanest approach.

upvoted 0 times

Colette

8 months ago

Agreed, D seems like the most straightforward choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

8 months ago

I think D is the best option too. It makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azzie

8 months ago

D does seem like the most logical option for this scenario. It simplifies the process for both the applicant and the company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

8 months ago

Agreed, D seems like the most straightforward choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

8 months ago

I think D is the best option too. It makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenore

8 months ago

I agree, D seems like the most straightforward choice for allowing applicants to apply for multiple positions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfred

9 months ago

I think D is the best option. It makes sense to link the applicant directly to the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bambi

9 months ago

So, majority of us lean towards C, right? Makes the application flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

9 months ago

Option A feels more like it focuses on the Position. We need to think about Application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keena

9 months ago

But what about option A? Isn't it similar?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

9 months ago

I think option C makes sense. It connects Application to Open Position.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacklyn

9 months ago

B seems like the logical choice. Linking the applicant to the application makes the most sense for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

Bonita

9 months ago

Yes, it would be easier to track the applicant's information and applications with that setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

9 months ago

I agree, option B makes the most sense for linking the applicant to the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

9 months ago

Not really. It's a bit tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlene

9 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. Creating a master-detail relationship on Open_Position__c to Application__c makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

Penney

8 months ago

Absolutely, it's a win-win situation for everyone involved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

8 months ago

I think we can all benefit from this recommendation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noble

8 months ago

That makes sense, it would streamline the process for both the applicants and the hiring team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

8 months ago

It would definitely make it easier for applicants to apply for multiple positions using a single application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

8 months ago

I agree, creating a master-detail relationship on Open_Position__c to Application__c is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

9 months ago

Option A is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brigette

10 months ago

Did anyone find the question easy?

upvoted 0 times

...