Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CPQ Specialist Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ Specialist exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All CPQ Specialist Questions]

Universal Containers (UC).utilizes bundles to sell hardware and related accessories together as a package. Several of the accessories are component-type Options, with quantities dependent on the hardware. UC wants to begin using split Orders to manage a fulfillment process, with Orders broken out based on when items are shipped to the customer.

Whet should UC consider before implementing split Orders ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Cathrine at Mar 20, 2024, 11:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPQ Specialist Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Raina
8 months ago
I believe UC must also ensure that the Order By field is utilized effectively for splitting bundles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
That could be efficient for managing fulfillment processes based on shipping dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
8 months ago
But what about the option to split hardware bundle and component-type Options into separate Orders without preserving the bundle structure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
8 months ago
I agree, the process of splitting Orders should be user-friendly to avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
I think UC should consider the ease of splitting hardware bundles and component-type Options manually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
8 months ago
I think option B) could also work, as long as the bundle structure is not preserved when splitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
8 months ago
I believe option A) is the best choice, as it allows for manual splitting of the hardware bundle and component-type Options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
8 months ago
I agree, UC needs to ensure that the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm gonna go with A. Why not just split it manually? Surely that can't be too much work, right? *chuckles sarcastically*
upvoted 0 times
Wendell
8 months ago
Definitely, manual splitting seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It gives more control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
9 months ago
I think A is the best option. It allows for manual splitting of the hardware bundle and component-type Options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hayley
9 months ago
Ooh, tricky one! I'm going to guess D. The Order By field should let them split things up without messing with the bundle. Gotta love those Salesforce features, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
7 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's a handy feature to have when managing split Orders. Salesforce really does make things easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
8 months ago
I think D is the way to go. The Order By field should help with splitting up the hardware bundle and component-type Options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The Order By field should make it easier to manage the fulfillment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
8 months ago
I think D is the right choice too. It seems like the most efficient way to split the Orders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The Order By field should make it easier to manage the fulfillment process without affecting the bundle structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
I think D is the way to go. The Order By field seems like the best option for splitting Orders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
9 months ago
Split Orders, huh? Sounds like a recipe for a fulfillment nightmare. I'm going with B - they can split the bundle, but it'll lose its structure. No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
9 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
8 months ago
I see, so the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split manually as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
8 months ago
That's true, the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split using the Order By field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
8 months ago
But what if the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split into separate Orders without preserving the bundle structure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
9 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
9 months ago
A) The hardware bundle and component-type Options can be spilt manually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
9 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
10 months ago
I think UC should consider their current fulfillment process before implementing split Orders.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel