Salesforce Exam CPQ Specialist Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ Specialist exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 8

Universal Containers (UC).utilizes bundles to sell hardware and related accessories together as a package. Several of the accessories are component-type Options, with quantities dependent on the hardware. UC wants to begin using split Orders to manage a fulfillment process, with Orders broken out based on when items are shipped to the customer.

Whet should UC consider before implementing split Orders ?

AThe hardware bundle and component-type Options can be spilt manually.

BThe hardware bundle and component-type Options can be spilt Into separate Orders without preserving the bundle structure.

CThe hardware bundle and component-type Options must be placed in the same Order together.

DThe hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split using the Order By field.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Cathrine at Mar 20, 2024, 11:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPQ Specialist Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Raina

7 months ago

I believe UC must also ensure that the Order By field is utilized effectively for splitting bundles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

7 months ago

That could be efficient for managing fulfillment processes based on shipping dates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiera

7 months ago

But what about the option to split hardware bundle and component-type Options into separate Orders without preserving the bundle structure?

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

7 months ago

I agree, the process of splitting Orders should be user-friendly to avoid confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

7 months ago

I think UC should consider the ease of splitting hardware bundles and component-type Options manually.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

7 months ago

I think option B) could also work, as long as the bundle structure is not preserved when splitting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanford

7 months ago

I believe option A) is the best choice, as it allows for manual splitting of the hardware bundle and component-type Options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

7 months ago

I agree, UC needs to ensure that the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split accordingly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

8 months ago

I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm gonna go with A. Why not just split it manually? Surely that can't be too much work, right? *chuckles sarcastically*

upvoted 0 times

Wendell

7 months ago

Definitely, manual splitting seems like the most practical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

7 months ago

Yeah, I agree. It gives more control over the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

7 months ago

I think A is the best option. It allows for manual splitting of the hardware bundle and component-type Options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

8 months ago

Ooh, tricky one! I'm going to guess D. The Order By field should let them split things up without messing with the bundle. Gotta love those Salesforce features, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Twanna

6 months ago

Yeah, I agree. It's a handy feature to have when managing split Orders. Salesforce really does make things easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desmond

6 months ago

I think D is the way to go. The Order By field should help with splitting up the hardware bundle and component-type Options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

6 months ago

Yeah, I agree. The Order By field should make it easier to manage the fulfillment process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

7 months ago

I think D is the right choice too. It seems like the most efficient way to split the Orders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

7 months ago

Yeah, I agree. The Order By field should make it easier to manage the fulfillment process without affecting the bundle structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

7 months ago

I think D is the way to go. The Order By field seems like the best option for splitting Orders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

8 months ago

Split Orders, huh? Sounds like a recipe for a fulfillment nightmare. I'm going with B - they can split the bundle, but it'll lose its structure. No thanks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

8 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

Cherelle

7 months ago

I see, so the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split manually as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Simona

7 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

7 months ago

That's true, the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split using the Order By field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

7 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Nydia

7 months ago

But what if the hardware bundle and component-type Options can be split into separate Orders without preserving the bundle structure?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pete

7 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

8 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

8 months ago

A) The hardware bundle and component-type Options can be spilt manually.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katheryn

8 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is C. The hardware bundle and component-type Options must be kept together in the same Order. Breaking them up doesn't sound like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

8 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

9 months ago

I think UC should consider their current fulfillment process before implementing split Orders.

upvoted 0 times

...