BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Developer Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Developer exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 3
[All B2C Commerce Developer Questions]

Given the requirement to add caching to an existing page while adhering to SFRA best practices, which code snippet should be used?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mattie at Jul 02, 2024, 10:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C Commerce Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kimbery
4 months ago
I'm feeling a bit caching-crazy over here! Seriously, Option B looks like the clear winner. Keeps things simple and SFRA-friendly. Now, who's up for a game of cache-and-seek?
upvoted 0 times
Ariel
3 months ago
Let's go with Option C, it looks like the most straightforward choice for SFRA best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 months ago
I think Option A might work better in this case, it seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the way to go for caching on an existing page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
3 months ago
Let's go with Option B for now and see how it goes. We can always switch to Option C if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
3 months ago
I think Option C might also be a good choice. It looks like it could work well for caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the way to go. It's clean and follows SFRA best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathan
4 months ago
Option B is the way to go, my friends. Gotta love that cache-busting in the URL. Keeps those browsers on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
Reta
3 months ago
Yeah, the cache-busting in the URL is a smart move to keep things running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the best choice for adding caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carisa
4 months ago
I think Option B could also be a good choice because it provides a balance between simplicity and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
4 months ago
But Option A seems more straightforward and efficient in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
4 months ago
Hmm, Option A seems a bit outdated. I think the SFRA best practices would recommend going with Option B. Can't go wrong with a classic cache-control header, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the best choice for adhering to SFRA best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
I'm not sure about Option C. That looks a bit too complicated for a simple caching requirement. Option B seems cleaner and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Agustin
3 months ago
Yeah, Option B is definitely the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
3 months ago
I think Option C might be overkill for just adding caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
4 months ago
I agree, Option C does seem a bit complex for just adding caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
4 months ago
I agree, Option B looks cleaner and easier to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matilda
4 months ago
I think we should use Option A for adding caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
5 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. Caching is all about efficiency, and this code snippet seems to follow the SFRA best practices.
upvoted 0 times
Rene
4 months ago
Yeah, it looks like it follows SFRA best practices for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for adding caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel