BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Architect Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Architect exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 3
[All B2C Commerce Architect Questions]

A developer is validating the pipeline cache and noticed that the PDP page is very low cached. The one parameter is snowing the position on the product fisting page upon checking the site and code.

What should the developer adjust in order to improve the page cache hit ratio, keeping in mind that the client is Insisting on the parameter for their analytics?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Mitsue at Jun 22, 2024, 12:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C Commerce Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carlton
4 months ago
I agree with Ashlyn. Option D seems like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider option D instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
4 months ago
But what if excluding the parameter affects the analytics?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
4 months ago
Hold up, did the question say the parameter is 'snowing' the position on the product listing page? I didn't know weather conditions could impact product listings. Anyway, Option C looks like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mike
3 months ago
Alaine: Let's go ahead and rework the implementation to improve the page cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
I think we should go with Option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
3 months ago
Yeah, reworking the implementation so it doesn't depend on that parameter sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
4 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lea
4 months ago
I'm not sure I agree with Option A. Passing the parameter to the analytics and excluding it from the cache parameters could introduce additional overhead and complexity. Option B might be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
4 months ago
True, adding the key to the cache exclude parameters could be more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
Option B might be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Makeda
5 months ago
Option A seems like a good solution. Reading the parameter on the client-side and excluding it from the cache parameters should help improve the cache hit ratio while still providing the necessary analytics data.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
4 months ago
That sounds like a good compromise. It should satisfy the client's need for analytics while also improving the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
A) Rework the implementation so it reads the parameter on client-side, passes it to the analytics and exclude it from cache parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel